Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 20.
Published in final edited form as: Sci Total Environ. 2018 Dec 4;657:187–199. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.483

Table 1.

Summary of epidemiological studies on health outcomes from exposures associated with oil drilling

Author(s) Year Country Study Design Study
Population and Sample
Size (n)
Findings Health
Effect
Quality
Cancer
San Sebastian et al. 2001 Ecuador Cross-sectional 10 cases from ~1000 residents in San Carlos,1989-98 Village near oil fields had to 3.6 times higher cancer incidence and mortality among males Effect Good
Hurtig and San Sebastian 2002 Ecuador Cross-sectional Cancer cases nin 4 exposed (n=473) vs 11 unexposed (n=512) counties, 1985-1998 Significant increase in incidence of (1) stomach, rectum, skin, soft tissue, and kidney cancer for men, (2) cervical and lymph cancer for women, and (3) hematopoeietic cancers for
children < 10 in oil exploration regions
Effect Good
Hurtig and San Sebastian 2004 Ecuador Cross-sectional 91 cancer cases, 1985-2000 Significantly elevated risk of leukemia among children < 14 years living in an oil extraction region Effect Good
Kelsh et al. 2009 Ecuador Ecological 7,713 deaths (of 2,569,685 person-years) in exposed vs 7,622 deaths (of 2,428,113 person-years) in unexposed regions, 1990-2005 No significant increase in county-level cancer mortality rates in oil producing regions No effect
Moolgavkar et al. 2014 Ecuador Ecological Population and mortality data, 1990-2010 No significant difference in cancer mortality rates between oil-producing and non-oil producing areas No effect Fair
McKenzie et al. 2017 United States Case-control 743 children (ages 0-24) with hematologic cancers vs non-hematologic cancers, 2001-2013 Children ages 5-24 with acute lymphocytic leukemia were 4.3 times more likely to live in an area with the highest concentration of oil and gas wells Effect Good
Birth & Reproductive Outcomes
San Sebastian et al. 2002 Ecuador Cross-sectional 365 exposed compared to 283 non-exposed women (ages 17-45), 1998-99 Increased likelihood of pregnancy resulting in spontaneous abortion among women in exposed communities Effect Good
Acute & non-cancer Outcomes
San Sebastian et al. 2001 Ecuador Cross-sectional 368 exposed compared to 291 in non-exposed communities between 1998-99 Exposed women had significantly higher prevalence of nose and throat irritation. Headaches, earaches, eye irritation, diarrhea, and gastritis associated with nearness to oil wells. Effect Good
Dahlgren et al. 2007 United States Cross-sectional 90 exposed vs 129 unexposed adults Higher prevalence of rheumatic diseases, lupus, neurological symptoms, respiratory symptoms, and cardiovascular problems Effect Good
Kudabayeva et al. 2014 Kazhakstan Cross-sectional 368 exposed children vs 447 unexposed Higher prevalence of goiter in children ages 7-11 living in oil-producing regions Effect Fair
Dey et al. 2015 India Cross-sectional 46 exposed vs 61 control participants Higher levels of respirable PM and NO2 associated with long-term liver injury in exposed group Effect Good
Kponee et al. 2015 Nigeria Cross-sectional 100 exposed vs 100 unexposed adults Increased reports of neurological and hematological health problems among exposed residents Effect Good
Ogbija et al. 2015 Nigeria Cross-sectional 373 participants living in oil-producing communities Household survey to assess perception of environmental degradation and enumerate cases of diarrhea, asthma, skin infection and bronchitis. --- Inadequate
Webb et al. 2016 Peru Cross-sectional 76 participants (ages 15 and older) No significant increase in mercury levels in urine in populations living near oil extraction sites. No effect Fair
Yermukhanov a et al. 2017 Kazhakstan Cross-sectional 424 participants with immunodeficiency syndrome (stages 2 and 3) Decrease prevalence of immunodeficiency decreased with increasing distance from oil fields Effect Fair
Occupational Health Studies
Esswein et al. 2013 United States Cross-sectional 111 personal breathing zone samples from workers in 5 states Silica levels of hydraulic fracturing oil workers were ~10 times higher than recommended levels Effect Good
Gun et al. 2004 Australia Cohort 708 Australian petroleum industry employee deaths of 17,165 persons, 1981-96 No significant increase in cancer mortality among cohort of workers in petroleum industry No effect Good
Kilburn 1993 United States Case Study 24-year old oil well tester exposed to 14,000 ppm hydrogen sulfide gas Persistent and severe neurobehavioral symptoms after acute hydrogen sulfide gas exposure Effect Fair
Mousa 2015 Not Specified Observational 34 male patients (ages 22-60) attending an oil field clinic, 2012-13 Oil field workers exposed to subchronic low levels of hydrogen sulfide reported upper respiratory tract bleeding Effect Inadequate
Paz-y-Miño et al. 2008 Ecuador Cross-sectional 46 oil workers exposed to hydrocarbons vs 46 non-exposed Increased risk of mutagenic and carcinogenic damage and increased symptoms of common illnesses among individuals exposed to petroleum hydrocarbons Effect Fair
Community Risk Perception
Baptiste and Nordenstam 2009 Trinidad and Tobago Cross-sectional 177 residents from 3 villages between, June to August 2006 Residents living closer to the drilling site had greater health and environmental concerns Effect Fair
Okoli 2006 Nigeria Cross-sectional 42 rural participants Rural communities affected by environmental degradation, pollution, job displacement and health concerns Effect Inadequate