Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 26;23(1):100–111. doi: 10.1007/s10157-018-1617-8

Table 3.

Cox proportional hazard ratios according to MIC and classifications based on two biomarkers

Classification Range Unit Subjects (n) Cox proportional hazard analysis
Multivariate HR 95% CI FDR-adjusted P value
MIC by AHTKV-α*
 1A + 1B < 3.0 %/year 80 1
 1C 3.0–4.5 112 1.31 0.03–2.58 0.0443
 1D + 1E 4.5 ≤ 104 3.36 2.00–4.71 < 0.0001
Three equally divided subgroups for baseline AHTKV-α
 A < 3.175 %/year 100 1
 B 3.175–4.53 98 1.62 0.46–2.79 0.006
 C 4.53 ≤ 98 3.49 2.26–4.73 < 0.0001
Three equally divided subgroups for baseline-measured HtTKV slope
 A < 1.748 %/year 98 1
 B 1.748–7.91 99 0.11 − 0.71–0.92 0.799
 C 7.91 ≤ 99 − 0.62 − 1.66–0.41 0.361

Multivariate hazard ratios (HR) were for worse adjacent subgroups. P values were compared between adjacent subgroups

MIC Mayo Image Classification for ADPKD, AHTKV-α age- and height-adjusted TKV growth rate as described in the text, TKV total kidney volume, HtTKV height-adjusted TKV, FDR false discovery rate