Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 23;10:384. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07945-w

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Comparison of macrofossil diversity presented in this study with previous works. With the exception of the Wuchiapingian, genus diversity in this study is higher than according to ref. 7, leading also to a less pronounced loss of diversity at the Permian–Triassic boundary, yet showing mostly similar trends. By comparison, family diversities in this study and ref. 5 are conspicuously different