Table 2.

Pairwise comparisons of overall fitness on four different hosts. Pairwise comparisons were made using a Kruskal Wallis rank sum test followed by a Nemenyi test with multiple comparisons. Statistically significant P-values (P<0.05) are shown in bold.

Host	Mean fitness (Standard Deviation)			Kruskal Wallis rank sum test		Nemenyi pairwise comparisons
	P. infestans	P. andina (EC-3)	P. betacei	χ2, df = 2	P-value	P. infestans vs P. andina (EC-3)	P. infestans vs P. betacei	P. betacei vs P. andina (EC-3)
Tomato (S. lycopersicum)	0.0481 (± 0.0589)	0.0421 (± 0.1055)	0 (± 0)	18.0462	1.206 × 10−4	0.5063	0.0097	0.2034
Potato (S. tuberosum var. capiro)	0.0146 (± 0.0341)	0.0267 (± 0.0486)	0 (± 0)	4.7732	0.09194	0.89	0.76	0.45
Yellow potato (S. phureja)	0.0604 (± 0.0450)	0.0545 (± 0.0574)	0 (± 0)	14.6133	6.711 × 10−4	0.999	0.019	0.021
Tree tomato (S. betaceum)	0.0659 (± 0.0622)	0.0298 (± 0.0462)	0.1025 (± 0.0583)	28.9611	5.143 × 10−7	0.036	0.033	5.7 × 10−7