Table 1. Key synthetic EPO protein glycoforms and folding from literature.
Synthetic EPO | Glycan/position |
Net charge a | Folding protocol b | Folding yield | Ref | |||
24 | 38 | 83 | 126 | |||||
‘click’ EPO1–165 | GalNAc-‘click’ | Gal-‘click’ | Glc-‘click’ | GalNAcα1-O-(CH2)3-‘click’ | 0 | 1 | N/A c | This work |
SEP-PEGylated EPO1–166 | Anionic tetraantennary polymer | Asn | Asn | Anionic tetraantennary polymer | –8 | 1 | 25–40% | 18 |
Lys24,38,83 EPO1–165 | N/A-Lys d | N/A-Lys d | Lys d | Ser | +3 | 1 | 26% | 11 |
Consensus EPO1–166 | Biantennary dodecasaccharide e | Biantennary dodecasaccharide e | Biantennary dodecasaccharide e | Sia-Man-Sia(Man) | –8 | 1 | 37% | 17 |
Glycotruncated consensus EPO1–166 | (GluNAc)2 | (GluNAc)2 | (GluNAc)2 | Sia-Man-Sia(Man) | –2 | 1 f | N/A g | 17 |
Disialyl83 EPO1–166 h | Asn | Asn | Biantennary dodecasaccharide i | Ser | –2 | 2 | 65% j | 45 |
Disialyl24,38,83 EPO1–166 k | Biantennary dodecasaccharide i | Biantennary dodecasaccharide i | Biantennary dodecasaccharide i | Ser | –6 | 2 | 68% j , l | 20 |
Disialyl38,83 EPO1–166 k | Asn | Biantennary dodecasaccharide i | Biantennary dodecasaccharide i | Ser | –4 | 2 | 58% j , l | 20 |
Disialyl24,83 EPO1–166 k | Biantennary dodecasaccharide i | Asn | Biantennary dodecasaccharide i | Ser | –4 | 2 | 43% j , l | 20 |
Disialyl24,38 EPO1–166 k | Biantennary dodecasaccharide i | Biantennary dodecasaccharide i | Asn | Ser | –4 | 2 | 49% j , l | 20 |
Disialyl83 EPO1–166 k | Asn | Asn | Biantennary dodecasaccharide i | Ser | –2 | 2 | 37% j , l | 20 |
aNet charge introduced at positions 24, 38, 83 and 126 only.
bFolding protocol 1 = the polypeptide was firstly denatured in a degassed solution of GnHCl (6 M, 5.8 mL) and 100 mM tris (pH = 8.5). The resulting ‘click’ EPO stock solution (0.1 mg mL–1) was then dialyzed against an initial degassed first folding solution containing guanidine (3 M), tris (100 mM), l-cysteine (4 mM) and l-cystine (0.5 mM) adjusted to pH 8.5. After 18 h, the first folding solution was replaced by a second folding solution of guanidine (1 M) and tris (100 mM) adjusted to pH 8.0, and the dialysis allowed to proceed for a further 21 h. The EPO solution was then transferred into a third folding solution of tris (10 mM) adjusted to pH 7.0 and dialyzed for 26 h. After the last dialysis, the ‘click’ EPO solution was concentrated to approx. 2 mL and purification by RP-HPLC was attempted; folding protocol 2 = the folding procedure was altered to begin with 8 M GnHCl at pH 7.5, the subsequent steps follow protocol 1. In some cases, minor variance in the times or temperature at each step are made by some authors.
cYield could not be determined as the correctly folded product could not be isolated from the partially folded adduct.
dResidue mutated from native sequence.
eBiantennary dodecasacharide = (Sia-Gal-GluNAc-Man)2-Man-GluNAc-GluNAc(Fuc).
fNo data specified, presumably folding attempted as per consensus glycoform.
gNo yield reported but peptide reported to aggregate significantly compared to consensus form.
hSequence mutated E21 → A and Q78 →A.
iBiantennary dodecasaccharide = (NeuNAc-Gal-GlcNAc-Man)2-Man-GlcNAc-GlcNAc.
jApproximation based on peak area.
kSequence mutated Q78→A.
lFolding yields were improved by 18–25% when performed with 0.01 mg mL–1 peptide concentration, due to minimizing formation of misfolded oligomers.