Table 8. Comparison of sociodemographic data between patients with and without comorbidities.
Pw/oSI | PwSI | p-value | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | 68 | 77 | |||
N (%) | N (%) | ||||
Age (Years) | 19–61R | 40.2 (11.0)a | 22–68R | 45.5 (11.2)a | 0.005t |
≤ 29 | 14 (20.6) | 5 (6.5) | |||
30–39 | 21 (30.9) | 23 (29.9) | |||
40–49 | 17 (25.0) | 18 (23.4) | |||
50–59 | 15 (22.1) | 23 (29.9) | |||
≥ 60 | 1 (1.5) | 8 (10.4) | |||
Gender | 0.259Fi | ||||
Female | 47 (69.1) | 60 (77.9) | |||
Male | 21 (30.9) | 17 (22.1) | |||
School years | 8–13R | 11.0 (1.4)a | 9–16R | 10.9 (1.3)a | 0.476t |
Educational level | 0.276Chi | ||||
No training | 3 (4.4) | 0 (0.0) | |||
Skilled worker | 43 (63.2) | 48 (62.3) | |||
Technical college | 4 (5.9) | 4 (5.2) | |||
University | 18 (26.5) | 25 (32.5) | |||
Employment status | 0.701Chi | ||||
In training | 3 (4.4) | 1 (1.3) | |||
Employed | 36 (52.9) | 39 (50.6) | |||
Unemployed | 2 (2.9) | 2 (2.6) | |||
Retiree | 24 (35.3) | 33 (42.9) | |||
Other | 3 (4.4) | 2 (2.6) | |||
Partnership | 0.344Fi | ||||
Yes | 48 (70.6) | 60 (77.9) | |||
No | 20 (29.4) | 17 (22.1) | |||
Place of residence | 0.473Chi | ||||
Rural community | 17 (25.0) | 22 (28.6) | |||
Provincial town | 15 (22.1) | 11 (14.3) | |||
Medium-sized town | 5 (7.4) | 10 (13.0) | |||
City | 31 (45.6) | 34 (44.2) | |||
Number of children | 0–3R | 1b | 0–3R | 1b | 0.904U |
0 | 24 (35.3) | 18 (23.4) | |||
1 | 15 (22.1) | 34 (44.2) | |||
2 | 25 (36.8) | 20 (26.0) | |||
3 | 4 (5.9) | 5 (6.5) | |||
Number of siblings | 0–8R | 1b | 0–13R | 1b | 0.296U |
0 | 4 (5.9) | 11 (14.3) | |||
1 | 40 (58.8) | 43 (55.8) | |||
≥ 2 | 24 (35.3) | 23 (29.9) |
MS, multiple sclerosis; N, number of patients; PwP, patients with polypharmacy; PwSI, patients with secondary illnesses; Pw/oP, patients without polypharmacy; Pw/oSI, patients without secondary illnesses; R, range.
a mean value (standard deviation);
b median;
Chi Chi-square test;
Fi Fisher’s exact test;
R range;
t two-sample two-tailed Student’s t-test;
U Mann-Whitney U test.