Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 4.
Published in final edited form as: Obesity (Silver Spring). 2019 Jan 4;27(2):339–348. doi: 10.1002/oby.22380

Table 2.

Correlates of purchasing a sugar-sweetened beverage or noncaloric beverage at a restaurant, U.S. households 2012–2013 (n=14,669).

 Variable Sugar-sweetened beveragea Low-calorie beverageb
OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Characteristics of person acquiring the purchase
Age
   Adult (40+ years) ref Ref
   Adult (20–39 years) 1.5 (1.2, 1.8)*** 0.7 (0.5, 0.9)**
   Adolescent (12–19 years) 2.6 (1.6, 4.4)** 0.4 (0.3, 0.7)**
   Child (<12 years) 1.8 (0.7, 4.9) 0.1 (0.0, 0.3)***
Sex
   Male ref Ref
   Female 0.9 (0.7, 1.0) 1.1 (0.9, 1.4)
Race
   White ref ref
   Black 1.1 (0.9, 1.3) 0.4 (0.3, 0.6)***
   Other race 0.8 (0.7, 0.9)** 0.9 (0.7, 1.1)
Hispanic
   No ref ref
   Yes 1.1 (0.9, 1.3) 0.8 (0.6, 0.9)**
BMI category
   Not overweight ref ref
   Overweight 1.0 (0.8, 1.2) 1.2 (1.0, 1.5)
   Obese 1.1 (0.9, 1.4) 1.1 (0.9, 1.4)
Characteristics of the household
Educational attainment
   <High School ref ref
   High School Grad 1.0 (0.7, 1.3) 1.2 (0.8, 1.7)
   >High School 0.8 (0.7, 1.1) 1.0 (0.7, 1.5)
Poverty status
   185%+ FPL ref ref
   100%−184% FPL 1.1 (0.9, 1.4) 0.9 (0.6, 1.2)
   <100% FPL 1.0 (0.7, 1.3) 0.9 (0.7, 1.2)
Food security status
   Food secure ref ref
   Marginal food security 1.3 (1.0, 1.6)* 0.7 (0.5, 1.0)
   Low food security 1.5 (1.1, 2.1)* 0.8 (0.5, 1.3)
   Very low food security 1.2 (0.9, 1.5) 0.7 (0.5, 0.8)**
Food assistance participation
   SNAP
     No ref ref
     Yes 1.0 (0.8, 1.2) 0.7 (0.6, 0.8)**
   WIC participant
     No ref ref
     Yes 1.3 (0.9, 1.8) 0.8 (0.6, 1.1)
Characteristics of the purchase
Restaurant type
   Small chain or independent restaurant ref ref
   Top fast food chain 1.9 (1.6, 2.3)*** 0.6 (0.5, 0.8)***
   Top fast casual chain 1.0 (0.8, 1.4) 1.5 (1.1, 2.1)*
   Top full-service chain 1.1 (0.8, 1.4) 1.2 (0.9, 1.7)
Combination meal
   No ref ref
   Yes 2.8 (1.3, 3.3)*** 1.0 (0.8, 1.2)
Kids’ menu
   No ref ref
   Yes 2.1 (1.2, 3.4)** 0.8 (0.5, 1.3)

Note: Logistic regression additionally controlled for the number of items purchased, whether the purchase was shared with other people, the timing of the purchase (breakfast, lunch dinner, or snack) whether the beverage came from a buffet, and whether or not the purchase was intended for multiple meals. Standard errors account for the sampling design.

a

“Sugar-sweetened beverages” include fruit drinks, sports and energy drinks, Vitamin water, and sweetened tea.

b

“Low-calorie beverages” include water, seltzer, diet beverages, and unsweetened coffee or tea. Boldface indicates statistically significant difference from reference group.

*

p<0.05

**

p<0.01

***

p<0.001