Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 8.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 20;175(11):1111–1120. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.17101124

TABLE 2.

Summary of the Studies Included in the Meta-Analyses of fMRI and EEG Studies of Reward Processing in Depression

Characteristic Overall Subjects
Under
Age 18
Subjects
Age 18
and Older

fMRI studies (N=38)

Sample composition
 Depressed subjects compared with
  healthy volunteers
  Whole brain only 15 1 14
  Whole brain and region of interest 24 4 20
 Subjects at high risk of depression
  compared with healthy volunteers
  Whole brain only 6 2 4
  Whole brain and region of interest 10 5 5
 Depression on continuum
  Whole brain only 3 0 3
  Whole brain and region of interest 8 3 5
 Overall
  Whole brain onlya 23 3 20
  Region of interest only 15 7 8
Reward types
 Monetary 32 9 23
 Primary 2 1 1
 Affective 3 3
 Accuracy 2 2
Tasks used
 Monetary incentive delay task 13 2 11
 Affective incentive delay task 1 1
 Decision making 1 1
 Wheel of fortune 4 4
 Card guessing 7 6 1
 Reward learning 4 4
 Pavlovian prediction 1 1
 Effort expenditure for rewards task 1 1
 Modified reward task 3 3
 Primary reward task 1 1
 Reward guessing task 1 1
 Gambling task 1 1

 EEG studies (N = 12)

Sample composition
 Depressed subjects compared with 5 2 3
  healthy volunteers
 Subjects with high risk of depression 2 1 1
  compared with healthy volunteers
 Depression on continuum 5 3 2
Reward types
 Monetary 11 5 6
 Points 1 1
Tasks used
 Doors guessing task 7 4 3
 A gambling task 3 3
 A reward guessing task 2 2
a

Significant difference between groups, p<0.001.