Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 24;9:626. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37226-x

Table 1.

Explained (Ri2) and predicted (Qi2) variance of the first three PLS components (i).

Predictor r E R12 R22 R32 Q12 Q22 Q32
Real tDCS
  Eabs 1% 0.39 0.44 0.12 0.17* −0.53 −4.24
  Eabs 2% 0.39 0.48 0.10 0.12* −0.79 −7.36
  Eabs 3% 0.39 0.50 0.08 0.09 −0.85 −9.38
  Eabs 10% 0.43 0.51 0.05 0.10* −0.64 −15.93
  En 1% 0.54 0.32 0.11 0.12* −0.99 −5.19
  En 2% 0.62 0.32 0.05 0.12* −1.40 −12.19
  En 3% 0.67 0.28 0.04 0.09 −1.94 −19.39
  En 10% 0.87 0.12 0.01 −0.00 −7.04 −88.15
Sham
  Eabs 1% 0.23 0.50 0.17 −0.23 −1.33 −5.61
  Eabs 2% 0.30 0.51 0.15 −0.28 −1.46 −8.27
  Eabs 3% 0.33 0.51 0.14 −0.32 −1.58 −9.85
  Eabs 10% 0.39 0.54 0.06 −0.38 −1.67 −20.76
  En 1% 0.58 0.25 0.12 −0.32 −2.60 −8.17
  En 2% 0.66 0.23 0.09 −0.25 −3.21 −12.70
  En 3% 0.71 0.22 0.06 −0.23 −3.88 −18.91
  En 10% 0.89 0.10 0.01 −0.13 −9.03 −122.36

The predictor variables are the EF absolute value or the normal component and the dependent variables are the mean normalized MEP of either real tDCS or sham stimulation. Ratio rE indicates the percentage of the highest EF values used for the PLS regression. *Q2 > 0.0975.