Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 24;5:1. doi: 10.1038/s41531-019-0074-8

Table 1.

PD prevalence and demographic characteristics among Medicare beneficiaries, by state

Medicare beneficiaries total, n PD, n Crude prevalence per 100,000 (95% CI) Age, race, sex adjusted PD prevalence (per 100,000)a Adjusted PD prevalence rank % Female Rank % female % 65–69 % 70–74 % 75–79 % 80–84 % 85+ Rank % 85+ % Dual eligible Rank % dual eligible
Alabama 512,181 7138 1393.64 (1361.81, 1426.02) 1459.18 14 46.7% 14 13.4% 19.8% 23.9% 21.9% 21.0% 45 18.6% 19
Alaska 59,735 604 1011.13 (933.25, 1093.75) 1086.54 47 38.6% 51 17.7% 24.8% 23.3% 17.4% 16.7% 51 22.7% 10
Arizona 529,547 6676 1260.70 (1230.91, 1291.01) 1279.80 33 39.7% 48 14.5% 20.3% 23.1% 20.7% 21.3% 43 9.2% 48
Arkansas 343,037 4415 1287.03 (1249.72, 1325.16) 1288.81 32 48.6% 5 12.5% 19.7% 23.4% 22.3% 22.0% 37 23.5% 7
California 2,248,672 34,101 1516.49 (1500.58, 1532.40) 1520.10 10 44.9% 29 12.2% 17.6% 20.9% 21.7% 27.6% 12 28.7% 2
Colorado 372,747 4524 1213.69 (1178.91, 1249.22) 1237.98 38 40.9% 47 15.1% 19.5% 21.1% 20.5% 23.8% 28 15.5% 29
Connecticut 350,160 5904 1686.08 (1643.84, 1729.13) 1560.43 4 46.2% 17 10.3% 15.3% 19.0% 22.3% 33.2% 1 25.7% 5
Delaware 126,971 1560 1228.62 (1169.14, 1290.33) 1272.21 36 43.1% 38 14.7% 19.9% 22.7% 21.5% 21.3% 42 15.3% 31
District of Columbia 52,694 646 1225.94 (1134.64, 1322.60) 1747.75 1 45.5% 25 12.4% 17.3% 22.6% 21.5% 26.2% 20 29.7% 1
Florida 1,875,551 30,653 1634.34 (1616.27, 1652.41) 1551.08 5 44.8% 31 10.5% 16.8% 21.8% 22.7% 28.2% 9 23.3% 9
Georgia 745,589 9251 1240.76 (1215.82, 1265.96) 1322.34 25 45.7% 23 13.1% 20.1% 23.6% 21.9% 21.3% 41 18.9% 18
Hawaii 89,335 1114 1246.99 (1175.79, 1321.34) 1265.80 37 45.6% 24 11.6% 16.3% 19.1% 21.7% 31.2% 3 12.0% 37
Idaho 141,265 1594 1128.37 (1074.29, 1184.46) 1129.67 43 42.3% 42 11.7% 19.1% 24.7% 22.2% 22.3% 35 16.8% 24
Illinois 1,236,916 19,466 1573.75 (1551.93, 1595.63) 1566.12 3 45.5% 26 11.5% 16.8% 21.4% 22.3% 28.0% 10 11.2% 41
Indiana 655,313 9751 1487.99 (1458.89, 1517.34) 1472.26 12 47.6% 9 12.7% 17.3% 22.5% 22.1% 25.4% 22 24.3% 6
Iowa 395,093 5504 1393.08 (1356.89, 1429.82) 1323.44 24 44.7% 32 12.4% 17.3% 22.2% 22.3% 25.8% 21 17.6% 20
Kansas 323,255 4977 1539.65 (1497.64, 1582.53) 1455.60 15 46.1% 18 12.2% 16.1% 20.9% 22.1% 28.7% 8 17.5% 21
Kentucky 432,696 6154 1422.24 (1387.28, 1457.85) 1432.57 18 49.3% 2 13.6% 18.3% 23.1% 21.8% 23.2% 31 20.1% 16
Louisiana 381,276 5466 1433.60 (1396.24, 1471.70) 1518.47 11 48.9% 4 13.4% 18.8% 23.1% 22.9% 21.8% 38 21.9% 12
Maine 168,276 2187 1299.65 (1246.37, 1354.60) 1237.83 39 44.4% 34 11.9% 17.4% 20.4% 22.7% 27.6% 13 26.0% 4
Maryland 651,007 8612 1322.87 (1295.33, 1350.84) 1414.82 20 46.5% 15 12.6% 18.0% 22.0% 21.1% 26.3% 19 15.5% 30
Massachusetts 675,050 9879 1463.44 (1435.00, 1492.13) 1420.75 19 45.0% 28 12.3% 17.4% 20.2% 21.4% 28.8% 7 15.9% 27
Michigan 928,374 13,097 1410.74 (1386.90, 1434.74) 1397.62 22 45.9% 20 12.0% 17.7% 21.0% 21.9% 27.4% 15 11.9% 39
Minnesota 548,458 4635 845.09 (821.12, 869.56) 802.88 51 42.1% 43 10.6% 16.4% 20.5% 24.7% 27.7% 11 5.2% 50
Mississippi 337,839 4130 1222.47 (1185.83, 1259.94) 1312.87 26 49.1% 3 13.7% 19.9% 24.3% 22.7% 19.4% 49 27.3% 3
Missouri 593,862 8745 1472.56 (1442.16, 1503.43) 1443.32 16 46.5% 16 12.9% 18.5% 21.7% 21.9% 25.0% 23 11.0% 42
Montana 127,884 1328 1038.44 (983.98, 1095.11) 1089.36 46 38.9% 50 15.3% 19.3% 22.1% 21.1% 22.3% 36 10.8% 43
Nebraska 217,187 3214 1479.83 (1429.69, 1531.26) 1403.70 21 43.7% 36 11.6% 16.7% 21.8% 22.4% 27.5% 14 10.2% 45
Nevada 214,117 2598 1213.35 (1167.63, 1260.39) 1306.13 28 43.4% 37 15.7% 22.0% 24.0% 19.5% 18.8% 50 17.3% 22
New Hampshire 180,003 2405 1336.08 (1283.82, 1389.91) 1297.98 30 41.7% 44 13.6% 18.9% 21.9% 21.7% 23.9% 26 6.1% 49
New Jersey 946,172 14,871 1571.70 (1546.78, 1596.91) 1541.23 8 45.9% 21 11.2% 17.1% 20.6% 22.2% 28.9% 6 17.0% 23
New Mexico 175,502 1805 1028.47 (982.08, 1076.49) 1010.21 49 42.8% 40 14.0% 19.0% 24.8% 22.3% 19.9% 48 20.4% 15
New York 1,468,850 26,160 1780.98 (1759.69, 1802.27) 1719.80 2 47.5% 10 11.2% 15.7% 20.4% 22.2% 30.5% 5 19.7% 17
North Carolina 907,156 11,008 1213.46 (1191.08, 1236.04) 1291.97 31 45.8% 22 13.8% 19.5% 22.5% 21.7% 22.6% 34 21.3% 13
North Dakota 93,148 1180 1266.80 (1196.48, 1340.14) 1122.78 44 44.9% 30 11.1% 16.4% 21.6% 24.0% 26.9% 16 4.3% 51
Ohio 928,421 13,485 1452.46 (1428.28, 1476.80) 1439.76 17 47.1% 11 13.0% 17.5% 21.6% 21.3% 26.6% 18 23.4% 8
Oklahoma 413,847 5045 1219.04 (1185.95, 1252.82) 1222.55 40 47.0% 12 13.7% 18.6% 24.0% 22.0% 21.7% 39 13.9% 33
Oregon 299,606 3331 1111.79 (1074.71, 1149.81) 1151.28 42 41.2% 46 15.0% 21.0% 22.4% 18.6% 23.1% 32 12.0% 38
Pennsylvania 1,080,256 17,272 1598.88 (1575.35, 1622.66) 1549.18 6 48.2% 7 11.6% 15.5% 20.1% 21.4% 31.2% 2 12.7% 35
Rhode Island 81,781 1288 1574.93 (1491.31, 1661.99) 1543.40 7 48.2% 8 13.4% 15.1% 19.3% 21.0% 31.1% 4 11.5% 40
South Carolina 540,745 6371 1178.18 (1149.69, 1207.20) 1274.95 35 46.0% 19 15.2% 20.8% 22.4% 20.9% 20.6% 46 13.1% 34
South Dakota 116,221 1352 1163.30 (1102.86, 1226.17) 1053.87 48 44.0% 35 13.4% 17.4% 23.4% 22.1% 23.7% 30 10.3% 44
Tennessee 597,675 8595 1438.07 (1408.12, 1468.32) 1466.00 13 48.4% 6 13.7% 19.2% 22.2% 22.1% 22.9% 33 16.3% 25
Texas 1,859,155 28,075 1510.09 (1492.63, 1527.57) 1521.95 9 46.8% 13 12.8% 18.7% 22.3% 22.1% 24.1% 24 20.5% 14
Utah 165,047 2232 1352.34 (1297.46, 1408.92) 1299.46 29 39.2% 49 12.7% 20.3% 24.6% 22.3% 20.1% 47 9.8% 46
Vermont 90,310 1035 1146.05 (1078.18, 1217.04) 1120.26 45 42.9% 39 12.5% 18.7% 23.0% 22.0% 23.8% 27 16.2% 26
Virginia 838,962 10,990 1309.95 (1285.78, 1334.32) 1366.83 23 44.6% 33 12.8% 19.1% 22.0% 22.4% 23.7% 29 12.7% 36
Washington 599,741 7424 1237.86 (1210.11, 1266.08) 1215.55 41 42.5% 41 12.4% 19.6% 22.6% 21.4% 23.9% 25 15.9% 28
West Virginia 216,202 2745 1269.64 (1223.10, 1317.49) 1307.36 27 49.9% 1 15.3% 19.6% 23.9% 20.0% 21.1% 44 22.2% 11
Wisconsin 532,630 6960 1306.72 (1276.48, 1337.48) 1279.27 34 45.5% 27 13.0% 16.6% 21.5% 22.2% 26.8% 17 9.6% 47
Wyoming 72,506 662 913.02 (845.73, 984.23) 883.63 50 41.5% 45 14.4% 21.8% 21.1% 21.3% 21.5% 40 14.2% 32

aAge-, race-, and sex-adjusted prevalence of PD using the direct method of standardization. Standard population was total Medicare beneficiary population