Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 24;9:662. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37718-w

Table 2.

EPS assessment in relation to bacterial and fungal growth.

Bacterial population log CFU/ml1 EPS titre (µg/ml) EPS D-GA content (%) D-GA (µg/ml) F. graminearum DNA titre (ng/µl)2
Control 1.19 ± 0.11a1* 0.8  ± 0.16a 6 0.05 ± 0.01a 13 ± 2.6
Wheat spike wash
Wheat spike wash A26 (Low)3 3.12 ± 0.12b 10 ± 2b 3 0.3 ± 0.06b <0.3
A26 (High) 3.09 ± 0.13b 10 ± 1.5b 3 0.3 ± 0.03b <0.3
Wheat spike wash A26Sfp (Low) 3.02 ± 0.10b 14 ± 2.6c 3.5 0.5 ± 0.1c 4.5 ± 0.8
A26Sfp (High) 3.02 ± 0.09b 15 ± 2.4c 6 0.9 ± 0.05d <0.3
½ TSB cultures
½ TSB cultures A26 8.89 ± 0.16 10.05 ± 2.23 3 0.3 ± 0.05 ND
A26Sfp 8.69 ± 0.11 15.02 ± 2.57 6 0.9 ± 0.09 ND
Sodium alginate 15 82 8.3 ± 0.83 ND
Levan 15 0 ND ND

1The bacteria were re-isolated by selective plating and confirmed by PCR13. 1*Counting of bacterial colony forming units was performed on ½ TSB plates

2F. graminearum DNA was isolated amplified and quantified using the Invitrogen™ Qubit™ 4 Fluorometer as described in Material and Methods.

3Two inoculum densities of A26 and A26Sfp (Low) −106 and (High) 108 cells per ml. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).

ND- not detected.