Table 4.
Description of parameters and constraints used in the models and their respective source whenever available
Name | Symbol | Constraints/range | Reference/note |
---|---|---|---|
SPS KM | KM5 | 0.1– 2 | 25, 52, 53 , |
Spinacia oleracea | |||
Pisum sativum | |||
Inv KM | KM6 | 7–13 | 54 |
Arabidopsis thaliana Oy-0 | |||
Hxk KM for GlcK activity | KM7 | 1.1–0.2 | 55, 56 |
(0.01–2 for gin2-1) | Helianthus annuus, various | ||
Hxk KM for FrcK activity | KM8 | 0.1–3 (0.1–5 for gin2-1) | 55, 56 |
Helianthus annuus, various | |||
Inv Ki for Frc inhibition | Ki6a | 0.001–10 | 57 |
Lolium temulentum | |||
Inv Ki for Glc inhibition | Ki6b | 0.001–10 | Assumed and optimized |
Hxk Ki for Frc inhibition | Ki7 | 0.01–10 | Assumed and optimized |
Hxk Ki for Glc inhibition | Ki8 | 0.001–10 | Assumed and optimized |
SPS maximal reaction rate | Vm5 | 10–20 for both | Measured |
Inv maximal reaction rate | Vm6 | 60–100 for Ler | Measured |
70–120 for gin2-1 | |||
GlcK maximal reaction rate | Vm7 | 2–4 for Ler | Measured |
0–1 for gin2-1 | |||
FrcK maximal reaction rate | Vm8 | 5–10 for Ler | Measured |
2–5 for gin2-1 | |||
Photosynthesis rate | r1 | Measured and splined | |
respiration rate | r2 | −28.6 for Ler N | Measured |
−37.5 for gin2-1 N | |||
−44.0 for Ler HL | |||
−47.5 for gin2-1 HL | |||
Rate of starch synthesis | r3 | 1–7.5 for N | Measured and splined |
5–26 for HL | |||
Rate of starch degradation | r4 | −4 to −10 for N | Measured and splined |
−6 to −20 for HL | |||
SPS activity as MM | r5 | (Vm5∙HP)/(km5 + HP) | Measured and splined |
Inv activity as MM | r6 | (Vm6∙Suc)/((km6∙(1 + Frc/Ki6a) + Suc)∙(1 + Glc/Ki6b)) | Measured and splined24,47,49 |
GlcK activity as MM | r7 | (Vm7 ∙Glc)/(km7 ∙(1 + Frc/Ki7) + Glc) | Measured and splined49 |
FrcK activity as MM | r8 | (Vm8 ∙Frc)/(km8∙ (1 + Glc/Ki8) + Frc) | Measured and splined49 |
Aa synthesis from Cit as MBE | r9 | r_ca ∙Cit | Assumed and optimized |
r_ca ∈ {0.01,100} | |||
SC formation from Aa as MBE | r10 | a_ba∙Aa | Assumed and optimized |
a_ba ∈ {0,1} | |||
SC formation from HP as MBE | r11 | ab_hp∙HP | Assumed and optimized |
ab_hp ∈ {0.0001,100} | |||
Exp rate from Aa as MBE | r12 | aa_e∙Aa | Assumed and optimized |
aa_e ∈ {0.0001,10} | |||
Exp rate from Suc as MBE | r13 | a_e∙Suc | Assumed and optimized |
a_e ∈ {0.0001,10} | |||
Cit formation from HP as MBE | r14 | hp_c∙HP | Assumed and optimized |
hp_c ∈ {0.01,10} | |||
MF formation from HP as MBE | r15 | hp_mf∙HP | Assumed and optimized |
hp_mf ∈ {0.01,10} | |||
MF formation from Cit as MBE | r16 | cit_mf∙Cit | Assumed and optimized |
cit_mf ∈ {0.01,10} | |||
Cit formation from MF as MBE | r17 | mf_cit∙MF | Assumed and optimized |
mf_cit ∈ {0.01,10} |
SPS sucrose-phosphate-synthase, Inv invertase, Hxk hexokinase, GlcK glucokinase, FrcK fructokinase, Frc fructose, Glc glucose, HP hexose phosphate, Exp export, SC structural carbon, Suc sucrose, Cit citrate, MF malate/fumarate, Aa amino acids, MM Michaelis–Menten kinetic, MBE mass balance equation. KM are given in mM and Vm in µmol h−1 gFW−1