Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 18;8(1):128–136. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1908

Table 4.

Performance estimates as concordance index (C‐index) and 95% confidence intervals of all seven models predicting OS and PFS

M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7
OS Training set 0.74 (0.67‐0.81) 0.64 (0.58‐0.71) 0.93 (0.87‐1.00) 0.93 (0.86‐1.00) 0.75 (0.68‐0.82) 0.94 (0.88‐1.00) 0.96 (0.89‐1.00)
Test set 0.59 (0.48‐0.70) 0.49 (0.37‐0.60) 0.61 (0.51‐0.72) 0.54 (0.44‐0.65) 0.64 (0.53‐0.75) 0.70 (0.59‐0.81) 0.73 (0.62‐0.84)
PFS Training set 0.68 (0.62‐0.75) 0.63 (0.56‐0.69) 0.73 (0.66‐0.79) 0.80 (0.73‐0.87) 0.70 (0.63‐0.77) 0.81 (0.74‐0.88) 0.79 (0.72‐0.85)
Test set 0.56 (0.45‐0.66) 0.50 (0.40‐0.61) 0.61 (0.50‐0.71) 0.45 (0.35‐0.56) 0.61 (0.51‐0.71) 0.68 (0.57‐0.78) 0.71 (0.60‐0.81)