Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 7;5(1):192–200. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.8b00882

Table 3. Results from Numerical Solutions to the Rate Law Implied by Scheme 1B.

Re126WWCuI Inputs: k3–1 = 60 ns; k4–1 = 1.15 μs; k9–1 = 120 μs
elementary rate constants k1–1 /ps K1 k5–1 /ns K2 k7–1 /ns k8–1 /ns
  400–475 1.5–2.0 7–9 0.55–0.75 125–750 60–90
yield and empirical time constants τ1 /ps τ2 /ns τ3 /ns τ4 /μs Φ124126  
  260–280 3.5–4 70–90 120 2.0–2.2  
Re126WWCuII Inputs: k3–1 = 60 ns;k4–1 = 1.15 μs; k8 = k9 = 0
elementary rate constants k1–1 /ps K1 k5–1 /ns K2 k7–1 /ns
  375–425 2.25–3.25 9–21 0.25–0.75 100–350
empirical time constants τ1 /ps τ2 /ns τ3 /ns    
  280–300 3.5–4.5 70–90    
Re126WFCuI Inputs: k4–1 = 1.15 μs; k5 = k6 = k8 = k9 = 0
elementary rate constants k1–1 /ps K1 k3–1 /ns
  234 5.7 61 ns
empirical time constants τ1 /ps τ2 /ns  
  200 71