Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 7;311(5):F967–F975. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00415.2016

Table 2.

Published renal hemodynamic values in T1D, T2D, and nondiabetic controls

Nondiabetic Controls
T1D
Younger Older Euglycemia Hyperglycemia Normofiltration Hyperfiltration T2D Overweight
Cohorts
    Ref. no. 81 99 81 81 81 81 89
    Size, n 25 26 N/A/73 N/A/73 35/73 38/73 52
Cohort characteristics
    Age, yr 27 ± 6 50 ± 13 / / 24 ± 5 23 ± 4 63 ± 7
    Female, % 56 50 / / 40 55 25
Renal hemodynamic parameters
    GFR 117 ± 11 95 ± 24 144 ± 32.9 156 ± 30.7 116 ± 10 177 ± 35 82 ± 4
    ERPF, ml·min−1·1.73 m−2 628 ± 162 497 ± 172 810 ± 269 831 ± 236 642 ± 93 970 ± 268 345 ± 18
    RBF, ml·min−1·1.73 m−2 1,039 ± 287 810 ± 279 1,299 ± 439 1,309 ± 399 1,031 ± 171 1,552 ± 466 605 ± 32
    RVR, mmHg/min 0.081 ± 0.019 0.068 ± 0.02 0.067 ± 0.017 0.080 ± 0.014 0.057 ± 0.017 0.184 ± 0.012
    FF 0.19 ± 0.04 0.20 ± 0.06 0.18 ± 0.04 0.19 ± 0.05 0.18 ± 0.03 0.18 ± 0.06 0.24 ± 0.01
    Filtration pressure, mmHg 22.4 ± 2.2 28 ± 6 30 ± 7 22 ± 2 32 ± 5
    RA, dyn·s−1·cm−5 1,676 ± 706 3,778 ± 2856 1,473 ± 798 1,325 ± 825 2,065 ± 597 914 ± 494 6,176 ± 607
    RE, dyn·s−1·cm−5 2,043 ± 463 1,596 ± 1,195 2,021 ± 590 2,205 ± 716 1,993 ± 367 2,047 ± 747 3,957 ± 105
    PGLO, mmHg 60 ± 3 52 ± 8 61 ± 8 62 ± 8 55 ± 3 66 ± 6 60 ± 1
    Oncotic pressure, mmHg 27 ± 3 23 ± 3 22 ± 3 22 ± 3 24 ± 3

Data are means ± SD; n, no. of subjects. ERPF, effective renal plasma flow; RVR, renal vascular resistance.