Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 25;14(1):e0211076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211076

Table 2. Structural-level properties of the tibia are influenced by PPR expression along the osteoblast lineage.

Mean +/- stdev (n = 10).

PPRfl/fl PPRcKO Two-Way ANOVA Results
Sedentary
mean (std)
Exercise
mean (std)
Sedentary
mean (std)
Exercise
mean (std)
Genotype
(p-value)
Activity
(p-value)
Interaction
(p-value)
Yield Load (N) 19.1 (4.5) 21.1 (2.6) 12.3 (2.1) ‡‡ 11.4 (2.3) ** <0.001 0.600 0.174
Yield Displacement (μm) 297.2 (84.4) 250.1 (50.5) 231.5 (45.1) 217.5 (40.2) 0.016 0.126 0.402
Ultimate Load (N) 21.2 (3.7) 22.5 (2.3) 14.1 (1.8) ‡‡ 13.6 (1.8) ** <0.001 0.649 0.322
Ultimate Displacement (μm) 372.8 (98.7) 293.1 (59.4) 381.2 (96.5) 390.5 (61.9) ** 0.056 0.215 0.112
Stiffness (N/mm) 82.47 (28.6) 109.5 (20.1) 61.2 (9.1) 60.3 (9.9) * <0.001 0.045 0.030
Pre-Yield Work (mJ) 2.96 (1.08) 2.57 (0.59) 1.62 (0.52) ‡‡ 1.43 (0.48) ** <0.001 0.352 0.863

p<0.05 compared to sedentary-PPRfl/fl

‡‡ p< 0.01 compared to sedentary-PPRfl/fl

* p< 0.05 compared to exercise-PPRfl/fl

** p< 0.01 compared to exercise-PPRfl/fl