Table 2. Comparison of top 20 h-index authors with ranks of abstract weights and centrality measures.
author | h-index | publi-cations | citations | weight rank | degree rank | l-index rank | closeness rank | betweenness rank | rank sum | total rank |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A 01 | 61 | 128 | 11,296 | 9 | 5 | 16 | 1 | 4 | 35 | 4 |
A 02 | 57 | 154 | 10,228 | 17 | 8 | 30 | 22 | 9 | 86 | 10 |
A 03 | 57 | 148 | 12,930 | 4 | 29 | 42 | 12 | 12 | 99 | 12 |
A 04 | 55 | 202 | 9,956 | 5 | 1 | 17 | 5 | 2 | 30 | 1 |
A 05 | 50 | 202 | 6,569 | 1 | 43 | 172 | 110 | 13 | 339 | 19 |
A 06 | 47 | 143 | 6,658 | 14 | 20 | 29 | 16 | 14 | 93 | 11 |
A 07 | 47 | 135 | 8,301 | 6 | 19 | 69 | 96 | 15 | 205 | 17 |
A 08 | 42 | 99 | 6,007 | 18 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 45 | 6 |
A 09 | 42 | 99 | 4,342 | 53 | 150 | 317 | 256 | 87 | 863 | 20 |
A 10 | 41 | 175 | 6,444 | 2 | 2 | 24 | 4 | 1 | 33 | 3 |
A 11 | 39 | 171 | 6,470 | 3 | 3 | 13 | 6 | 5 | 30 | 2 |
A 12 | 39 | 122 | 5,390 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 20 | 43 | 5 |
A 13 | 39 | 127 | 6,367 | 12 | 21 | 9 | 2 | 6 | 50 | 7 |
A 14 | 38 | 93 | 3,922 | 62 | 28 | 18 | 32 | 42 | 182 | 15 |
A 15 | 38 | 98 | 4,671 | 21 | 47 | 46 | 53 | 55 | 222 | 18 |
A 16 | 37 | 91 | 6,564 | 47 | 45 | 47 | 30 | 30 | 199 | 16 |
A 17 | 36 | 119 | 4,206 | 8 | 11 | 23 | 15 | 19 | 76 | 8 |
A 18 | 35 | 112 | 4,389 | 11 | 36 | 44 | 48 | 25 | 164 | 14 |
A 19 | 34 | 95 | 3,492 | 20 | 12 | 7 | 21 | 24 | 84 | 9 |
A 20 | 34 | 93 | 3,915 | 49 | 18 | 20 | 19 | 10 | 116 | 13 |
The table shows the 20 most successful authors according to h-index and compares their ranks according to weight, degree, closeness, betweenness and l-index among all authors. A total rank of each author among the top 20 is given by the ranking of the sum of all five ranks.