Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 25;14(1):e0210994. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210994

Table 2. Comparison of top 20 h-index authors with ranks of abstract weights and centrality measures.

author h-index publi-cations citations weight rank degree rank l-index rank closeness rank betweenness rank rank sum total rank
A 01 61 128 11,296 9 5 16 1 4 35 4
A 02 57 154 10,228 17 8 30 22 9 86 10
A 03 57 148 12,930 4 29 42 12 12 99 12
A 04 55 202 9,956 5 1 17 5 2 30 1
A 05 50 202 6,569 1 43 172 110 13 339 19
A 06 47 143 6,658 14 20 29 16 14 93 11
A 07 47 135 8,301 6 19 69 96 15 205 17
A 08 42 99 6,007 18 6 6 7 8 45 6
A 09 42 99 4,342 53 150 317 256 87 863 20
A 10 41 175 6,444 2 2 24 4 1 33 3
A 11 39 171 6,470 3 3 13 6 5 30 2
A 12 39 122 5,390 10 4 1 8 20 43 5
A 13 39 127 6,367 12 21 9 2 6 50 7
A 14 38 93 3,922 62 28 18 32 42 182 15
A 15 38 98 4,671 21 47 46 53 55 222 18
A 16 37 91 6,564 47 45 47 30 30 199 16
A 17 36 119 4,206 8 11 23 15 19 76 8
A 18 35 112 4,389 11 36 44 48 25 164 14
A 19 34 95 3,492 20 12 7 21 24 84 9
A 20 34 93 3,915 49 18 20 19 10 116 13

The table shows the 20 most successful authors according to h-index and compares their ranks according to weight, degree, closeness, betweenness and l-index among all authors. A total rank of each author among the top 20 is given by the ranking of the sum of all five ranks.