Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 25;14(1):e0210994. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210994

Table 3. Comparison of top 20 h-index institutions with ranks of abstract weights and centrality measures.

insti
tution
h-index publi-cations citations weight rank degree rank closeness rank betweenness rank rank sum total rank
I 01 96 854 37,373 1 1 1 2 5 1
I 02 88 748 32,590 11 15 16 9 51 4
I 03 87 649 31,892 86 96 111 61 354 18
I 04 86 720 34,336 30 13 11 21 75 7
I 05 85 578 28,390 4 5 5 8 22 2
I 06 85 424 29,041 25 11 12 12 60 5
I 07 76 987 28,894 15 17 23 6 61 6
I 08 75 317 22,403 66 70 79 48 263 16
I 09 75 773 26,736 23 7 7 13 50 3
I 10 75 507 23,940 32 104 100 54 290 17
I 11 73 433 18,939 3 44 46 35 128 12
I 12 70 525 20,775 19 20 18 25 82 9
I 13 70 474 20,374 20 36 47 32 135 13
I 14 69 370 17,094 114 117 91 138 460 19
I 15 69 439 18,232 27 28 33 34 122 11
I 16 69 254 17,943 91 50 71 33 245 15
I 17 68 455 17,966 9 30 24 16 79 8
I 18 68 467 17,797 336 339 262 263 1,200 20
I 19 67 374 16,362 45 45 64 57 211 14
I 20 67 800 22,359 16 29 30 24 99 10

The table shows the 20 most successful institutions according to h-index and compares their ranks according to weight, degree, closeness and betweenness among all institutions. A total rank of each institution among the top 20 is given by the ranking of the sum of all four ranks.