Table 3. Comparison of top 20 h-index institutions with ranks of abstract weights and centrality measures.
insti tution |
h-index | publi-cations | citations | weight rank | degree rank | closeness rank | betweenness rank | rank sum | total rank |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I 01 | 96 | 854 | 37,373 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 1 |
I 02 | 88 | 748 | 32,590 | 11 | 15 | 16 | 9 | 51 | 4 |
I 03 | 87 | 649 | 31,892 | 86 | 96 | 111 | 61 | 354 | 18 |
I 04 | 86 | 720 | 34,336 | 30 | 13 | 11 | 21 | 75 | 7 |
I 05 | 85 | 578 | 28,390 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 22 | 2 |
I 06 | 85 | 424 | 29,041 | 25 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 60 | 5 |
I 07 | 76 | 987 | 28,894 | 15 | 17 | 23 | 6 | 61 | 6 |
I 08 | 75 | 317 | 22,403 | 66 | 70 | 79 | 48 | 263 | 16 |
I 09 | 75 | 773 | 26,736 | 23 | 7 | 7 | 13 | 50 | 3 |
I 10 | 75 | 507 | 23,940 | 32 | 104 | 100 | 54 | 290 | 17 |
I 11 | 73 | 433 | 18,939 | 3 | 44 | 46 | 35 | 128 | 12 |
I 12 | 70 | 525 | 20,775 | 19 | 20 | 18 | 25 | 82 | 9 |
I 13 | 70 | 474 | 20,374 | 20 | 36 | 47 | 32 | 135 | 13 |
I 14 | 69 | 370 | 17,094 | 114 | 117 | 91 | 138 | 460 | 19 |
I 15 | 69 | 439 | 18,232 | 27 | 28 | 33 | 34 | 122 | 11 |
I 16 | 69 | 254 | 17,943 | 91 | 50 | 71 | 33 | 245 | 15 |
I 17 | 68 | 455 | 17,966 | 9 | 30 | 24 | 16 | 79 | 8 |
I 18 | 68 | 467 | 17,797 | 336 | 339 | 262 | 263 | 1,200 | 20 |
I 19 | 67 | 374 | 16,362 | 45 | 45 | 64 | 57 | 211 | 14 |
I 20 | 67 | 800 | 22,359 | 16 | 29 | 30 | 24 | 99 | 10 |
The table shows the 20 most successful institutions according to h-index and compares their ranks according to weight, degree, closeness and betweenness among all institutions. A total rank of each institution among the top 20 is given by the ranking of the sum of all four ranks.