Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 25;14(1):e0211206. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211206

Table 1. Physician characteristics classified by proper assessment of overstated conclusion.

Category Characteristics Proper
(n = 159)
Not proper
(n = 127)
p-value*
Sex, n (%) Male 133 (83.6) 110 (86.6) 0.51
Postgraduate year, mean (SD) 15.8 (9.5) 19.4 (8.6) 0.001
Workplace, n (%) Clinic 42 (26.4) 38 (29.9) 0.6
Board certification§, n (%) 138 (86.8) 121 (95.3) 0.015
Doctorate grade, n (%)   48 (30.2) 45 (35.4) 0.38
PI||, n (%) 71 (44.7) 35 (27.6) 0.003
Information resource, n (%) Pharmacological company§ 10 (6.3) 14 (11.0) 0.2
EBM workshop**, n (%) 107 (67.3) 79 (62.2) 0.38
Abstract ≥5††, n (%)   92 (57.9) 82 (64.6) 0.27

*p-value for Fisher’s Exact test

Rating less than 5 for the validity of overstated abstract conclusion on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being not at all and 10 being very likely

Rating 5 or more for the validity of overstated abstract conclusion on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being not at all and 10 being very likely

§Any board certification

||Clinical research experience as a principal investigator

Access to research information (only from pharmacological company)

**Ever attended an evidence based medicine workshop

††Reading 5 or more abstracts in the last month

SD = Standardized deviation, PI = Principal investigator, EBM = Evidence based medicine