Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 25;14(1):e0210757. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210757

Table 2. CFA models’ goodness of fit for the FPQ-III, FPQ-SF and FPQ-9.

Model SBχ2 df p RMSEA RMSEA CI CFI SRMR
30-items three factors model
1. Without errors’ covariance 2336.55 402 < .001 0.097 0.093; 0.100 0.86 0.095
2. With 5 errors’ covariancea 1136.25 397 < .001 0.060 0.056; 0.065 0.95 0.075
20-items four factors model
3. Without errors’ covariance 660.91 164 < .001 0.077 0.071; 0.083 0.92 0.078
4. With 2 errors’ covarianceb 458.29 162 < .001 0.060 0.053; 0.066 0.95 0.063
9-items three factors model
5. Without errors’ covariance 63.32 24 < .001 0.057 0.040; 0.074 0.97 0.048
6. With 1 errors’ covariancec 43.60 23 .006 0.042 0.022; 0.061 0.98 0.037

Note.

a = covariances between items 8–11, 8–14, 11–14, 3–6 and 26–29

b = covariances between items 3–6 and 26–29

c = covariances between items 14–17.