Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 25;14(1):e0211128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211128

Table 3. Growth parameters, feed intake, exposure estimation, survival, proximate body composition and organ weights of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) exposed to graded levels of EQ through their diet for 90 days.

  Dietary treatment
Growth parameters EQ 0 EQ 1 EQ 2 EQ 3 EQ 4 EQ 5 P-values
Final length (cm) 36.3 ± 3.5 37.0 ± 3.6 37.6 ± 3.3 37.9 ± 3.0 34.4 ± 3.1 29.4 ± 3.2* < .0001
Final body weight (g) 716.3 ± 234.5 728.1 ± 222.9 784.5 ± 197.2 756.7 ± 190.7 537.2 ± 155.5* 301.5 ± 111.5* < .0001
Body weight gain (g) 454.2 ± 234.5 467.5 ± 222.4 515.3 ± 197.4 493.9 ± 190.6 275.8 ± 155.4* 37.61 ± 111.7* < .0001
Specific growth rate (%*day-1) 1.1 ± 0.3 1.1 ± 0.3 1.2 ± 0.3 1.1 ± 0.3 0.8 ± 0.3* 0.1 ± 0.4* < .0001
Condition factor (g/cm3) 1.5 ± 0.1 1.4 ± 0.1 1.4 ± 0.1 1.4 ± 0.1 1.3 ± 0.1* 1.1 ± 0.1* < .0001
Mean daily feed intake (g*fish-1)a 4.9 ± 0.1 4.6 ± 0.6 5.1 ± 0.3 4.4 ± 0.4 2.9 ± 0.1* 1.1 ± 0.3* < .0001
Mean total feed intake (g*fish-1)b 435.9 ± 4.0 407.4 ± 50.7 452.6 ± 25.5 397.6 ± 32.5 255.0 ± 6.2* 100.0 ± 24.4* < .001
Feed conversion rate (*fish-1) 1.0 ± 0.2 0.9 ± 0.1 0.9 ± 0.1 0.8 ± 0.1 0.9 ± 0.1 4.0 ± 3.3 0.072
Total EQ consumed (mg*fish-1) 0.205 ± 0.002 17 ± 2 54 ± 3 466 ± 38* 1016 ± 25* 966 ± 236* < .001
Estimated daily EQ exposure
(mg*kg BW-1*day-1)c
0.0049 ± 0.0002 0.41 ± 0.05 1.22 ± 0.04 11 ± 1* 30 ± 2* 40 ± 10* < .001
Survival (%) 100 100 100 100 100 100
Proximate body composition whole fish (% ww)
Crude protein (N*6.25) 17.3 ± 0.6 18.0 ± 0.0 17.7 ± 0.6 18.0 ± 1.0 17.7 ± 0.6 17.3 ± 0.6 0.643
Crude lipid 15.2 ± 0.4 14.1 ± 0.2 14.1 ± 0.5 13.3 ± 0.4* 11.0 ± 0.4* 8.7 ± 1.3* < .001
Ash 1.8 ± 0.2 1.8 ± 0.2 2.0 ± 0.2 1.8 ± 0.1 1.9 ± 0.1 2.1 ± 0.1 0.207
Dry matter 34.0 ± 1.4 33.3 ± 0.7 33.9 ± 1.6 33.3 ± 0.6 30.0 ± 0.1* 27.8 ± 1.1* < .001
Crude lipid muscle 4.1 ± 1.0 3.5 ± 0.1 3.7 ± 0.7 4.0 ± 0.4 2.7 ± 0.1* 1.8 ± 0.7* < .01
Organ weights
Heart (g) 0.8 ± 0.3 0.8 ± 0.2 0.9 ± 0.2 0.8 ± 0.2 0.6 ± 0.2 0.4 ± 0.1* < .001
Cardiosomatic index (*100) 0.12 ± 0.01 0.10 ± 0.01 0.11 ± 0.01 0.10 ± 0.01 0.11 ± 0.01 0.12 ± 0.02 0.108
Liver (g) 8.0 ± 2.9 7.8 ± 2.4 8.8 ± 2.2 8.2 ± 2.5 6.7 ± 2.0 3.2 ± 1.3* < .001
Hepatosomatic index (*100) 1.05 ± 0.10 1.02 ± 0.08 1.08 ± 0.08 1.08 ± 0.12 1.16 ± 0.10 1.01 ± 0.20 0.102
Spleen (g) 0.6 ± 0.2 0.6 ± 0.3 0.6 ± 0.2 0.6 ± 0.3 0.5 ± 0.1 0.2 ± 0.1* < .01
Spleen somatic index (*100) 0.08 ± 0.02 0.08 ± 0.02 0.08 ± 0.01 0.08 ± 0.02 0.09 ± 0.03 0.07 ± 0.02 0.067

Measurements performed on tank pooled samples or tank means (n = 3/group) were analyzed performing one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test for multiple comparison of group means. For parameters including replicate measurements from the individual tanks, a nested ANOVA was fit using a mixed effects model (n = 25–30) with tank treated as a random effect, and post-hoc comparison of least-square group means adjusting for multiple comparisons. Results are presented as means ± SD of all measurements.

* p<0.05, compared to the control (EQ 0).

a Daily feed intake recorded per tank divided by number of fish.

b Sum of daily feed intake per fish

c Calculated from daily feed intake per fish and interpolated body weight per fish. Abbreviation: BW, Body weight.