Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 1;186:286–300. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.11.006

Fig. 13.

Fig. 13

Overall comparison of FEAT and dHCP pipelines using t-statistics from the GLM output for all 15 subjects. Comparing the thresholded group activity maps (TFCE, default parameters, 5% FWER corrected), the dHCP pipeline resulted in increased sensitivity to signal in both cortical and subcortical regions. Compared to the unilateral activity detected in the thalamus and cingulate cortex using the FEAT pipeline, the bilateral activity detected in these regions using the dHCP pipeline could lead to a substantially different interpretation of the data.