Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 1;186:286–300. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.11.006

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Comparison of motion correction and distortion correction (MCDC) between FEAT and dHCP pipelines using t-statistics from the GLM output for all 15 subjects. After thresholding the group activity maps (TFCE, default parameters, 5% FWER corrected), the dHCP pipeline resulted in greater sensitivity to signal in both cortical and subcortical regions. Using the dHCP pipeline, bilateral thalamic activity was detected. Using the FEAT pipeline, only contralateral thalamic activity was detected. Note, spatial smoothing is matched across FEAT and dHCP preprocessing pipelines.