Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2018 Oct 15;27(2):240–247. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2018.10.002

Table 3.

Relative risk ratios (and 95% confidence intervals) from multinomial logistic regression analyses assessing associations between predictors and cluster assignment

Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Cluster 3
Enjoyment Health benefit Constrained
Predictors RRR* 95% CI RRR* 95% CI
Female gender 0.88 0.26 to 2.96 1.69 0.62 to 4.59 Reference
Any comorbidity 0.57 0.19 to 1.69 0.54 0.22 to 1.36
Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale score 1.00 0.91 to 1.06 2.10 1.16 to 3.87
PROMIS pain interference T score 0.53 0.34 to 0.86 0.70 0.47 to 1.05
Radiographic KOA (KL grade II or higher) 0.30 0.10 to 0.96 1.00 0.35 to 2.83
Age (65 or greater) 0.75 0.26 to 2.21 0.38 0.15 to 0.97
BMI (>= 30) 1.62 0.53 to 4.96 1.96 0.76 to 5.18

KOA=knee osteoarthritis, OR = adjusted odds ratio, 95% CI = 95% Confidence Interval, multinomial logistic regression includes all predictors in Table 3.

*

Adjusted Relative Risk Ratio (RRR) from multinomial logistic regression including all predictors in Table 3 compares each cluster to referent cluster 3.

The adjusted RRR was scaled to ½ SD (5 point) change in PROMIS score and a 3-point change in Self Efficacy for Exercise Scale.

P<0.05