Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 10;31(1):75–78. doi: 10.1589/jpts.31.75

Table 2. Quality checklist scores for four studies.

Criteria Draak et al. Kierkegaard et al. Kim et al. Lang et al.
1. Participant inclusion/exclusion criteria explicit 1 2 2 2
2. Participants enrolled consecutively or systematically 2 2 2 2
3. Attrition addressed 2 1 2 2
4. Grip strength measure described 4 3 4 5
5. Measurement bias 1 2 1 2
6. Measurement hiatus 2 2 2 2
7. Intervention or inter-test activity described 2 0 0 0
8. ROC with AUC for cut-point 0 1 2 0
9. MCID anchors 1 1 1 1

Total 15 14 16 16

1. Both (2), one (1), neither (0); 2. Yes (2), unclear (1), no (0); 3. No attrition or yes & <25%, reasons given (2), yes but >25%, reasons given (1), no or>25%, no reasons given; 4. Instrument, adjustment, position, trials, criterion measurement described (5); 4/5 (4), 3/5 (3), 2/5 (2), 1/5 (1), 0/5 (0); 5. Blind, duplicate, or independent observer (2), unclear (1), investigator or treating clinician (0); 6. Specifically (2), vaguely (1), no (0); 7. Specifically (2), vaguely (1), no (0); 8. Cut point from ROC noted & AUC≥0.70 reported (2), cut point from ROC noted but AUC<0.70 (1), cut point not determined by ROC (0); 9. More than one anchor (2), one anchor (1), anchor not designated (0).