Table 2: Outcome after 12 months (n = 19)a .
| Outcome | n (%) |
|---|---|
| Patient satisfaction | |
| Satisfied (score ≥3) | 14 (74) |
| Unsatisfied (score <3) | 2 (11) |
| Too many items rated as ‘not applicable’ | 3 (16) |
| General healthb | 52.4 (18.4) |
| Prostate-related symptoms | |
| Severe incontinence | 9 (47) |
| Severe bowel problems | 2 (11) |
| Severe fatigue | 7 (37) |
| Healthcare providers visited in past 12 months | |
| GP | 19 (100) |
| Practice nurse | 7 (37) |
| Specialist (excluding urologist) | 6 (32) |
| Physiotherapist | 5 (26) |
| Urologistc | 4 (21) |
aOne patient died during the observation period, so no outcome was recorded. bMeasured 12 months after inclusion with the ‘general health’ subscale of the RAND-36: five items, measured on a 5-point Likert-scale. cThree patients were referred back to the urologist and one saw the urologist because he inadvertently received a letter that he had missed his follow-up visit at the hospital.