. 2019 Jan 14;21:101661. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101661

Table 4.

Significant interaction between disease status and the five specific frequency bands on ReHo (flexible factorial design, 2 × 5).

Brain regions	BA	Peak t-scores	MNI coordinates			Cluster size (voxels)
Brain regions	BA	Peak t-scores	x	y	z	Cluster size (voxels)
Association between the frequency band (slow-2 to slow-6) and disease on KCC-ReHo
Right CPL		28.262^※	3	−36	−60	650
Brainstem/midbrain		42.788	9	−15	−33	489
Left BG		29.448	12	14	−12	611
Right IPL/angular cortex	40,39,19	29.801	54	−51	21	729
Bilateral mPFC/ACC	10,32	23.818	−30	48	12	1711
Bilatral cuneus	17,18	20.795	9	−90	6	176
Bilatertal precuneus/PCC	7,31,40	46.157	0	−48	33	2576

Association between the frequency band (slow-2 to slow-6) and disease on KCC-ReHo
Right CPL		26.177	15	−42	−42	685
Left insula/BG	20	31.569	−15	21	15	1460
Right inferior temporal gyrus	20,21	25.218	51	−12	−27	303
Right insula/BG	13	33.908	21	21	6	1083
Bilateral precuneus/PCC	7,31,40	42.280	0	−63	21	1815
Left IPL/angular cortex	39,19	21.651	−57	−51	12	529
Right IPL/angular cortex	39,40,19	26.486	51	−57	21	375

Note:^※The F-test was statistically significant for an interaction between the ReHos of the five specific frequency bands (slow-2 to slow-6) and disease status. The T-test was statistically significant for particular analyses of interaction. All clusters were analyzed using a two-tailed test with a voxel-level threshold of P < .01, GRF correction, and cluster-level of P < .05.