Table 2.
Model 1a | Model 2b | Model 3c | Model 4d | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR | 95% CI | p | OR | 95% CI | p | OR | 95% CI | p | OR | 95% CI | p | |
Spanish women (n = 40) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||||
Chinese women (n = 33) | 0.21 | 0.05–0.90 | 0.037 | 0.52 | 0.06–4.79 | 0.292 | 1.68 | 0.06–44.6 | 0.852 | 0.33 | 0.05–2.33 | 0.305 |
aModel 1, adjusted for SES (FAS+ parental education level) and biological confounders (age, cesareans, birth weight)
bModel 2, adjusted for SES, biological confounders and working conditions (paid work, return-to-work intention)
cModel 3, adjusted for SES, biological confounders and working conditions (work status, return-to-work time frame)
dModel 4, adjusted for SES, biological confounders and attitudinal variables (IIFAS)