Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 13;2019:7146168. doi: 10.1155/2019/7146168

Table 4.

RCFT performance distributions within each of the three groups.

RCFT measure Performance levels§ NF1
N (%)
Residual
S
N (%)
Residual
TD
N (%)
Residual
χ 2 Exact p
Copy >-1 SD 6 (33.3) -2.9 13 (76.5) 1.6 13 (72.2) 1.3 9.749 0.038
<-1 SD 4 (22.2) 0.7 3 (17.6) 0.1 2 (11.1) -0.8
<-2 SD 8 (44.4) 2.7 1 (5.9) -2.0 3 (16.7) -0.7

Immediate recall >-1 SD 5 (27.8) -3.3 11 (64.7) 0.6 15 (83.3) 2.6 13.517 0.005
<-1 SD 6 (33.3) 1.1 5 (29.4) 0.6 2 (11.1) -1.6
<-2 SD 7 (38.9) 3.0 1 (5.9) -1.6 1 (5.6) -1.6

Delay Recall >-1 SD 3 (16.7) -3.6 11 (64.7) 1.4 13 (72.2) 2.2 17.924 0.001
<-1 SD 7 (38.9) 1 6 (35.3) 0.6 3 (16.7) -1.5
<-2 SD 8 (44.4) 3.4 0 (0.0) -2.4 2 (11.1) -1.0

Recognition >-1 SD 15 (83.3) 0.7 11 (64.7) -1.5 15 (83.3) 0.7 6.901 0.071
<-1 SD 3 (16.7) -0.3 6 (35.3) 2.1 1 (5.6) -1.8
<-2 SD 0 (0.0) -1.0 0 (0) -1.0 2 (11.1) 2.0

Legend. NF1: neurofibromatosis type 1; S: siblings; TD: typically developing children; RCFT: Rey Complex Figure Test. The significant corrected standardized residuals are bolded. §Performance levels are represented as follows: >-1 SD: normal, <-1 SD: borderline, <-2 SD: impaired.