Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Aug 18;191:215–222. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.06.037

Table 6.

Illicit Drug Use Models

Model Effect b OR SE z p
Unmoderated Slope (relationship inv. → drug use)          
  Fixed Effect (average slope) −.31 .73 .05 −5.58 < .001
  Random Effect (variance of slope) .23   .07 3.52 < .001
Gender Moderated Slope (relationship inv. → drug use)          
  Fixed Effect (average slope) −.91 .40 .14 −6.75 < .001
  Random Effect (variance of slope) .42   .06 6.65 < .001
  Gender → Slope .19   .17 1.10 .27
Sexual Identity Moderated Slope (relationship inv. → drug use)          
  Fixed Effect (average slope) −.58 .56 .09 −6.29 < .001
  Random Effect (variance of slope) .44   .06 7.01 < .001
  Sexual Identity → Slope 1.45   .15 9.67 < .001
Age Moderated Relationship Involvement .04 1.04 .25 .15 .88
Age .06 1.06 .05 1.20 .23
Relationship Inv.*Age −.05 .95 .09 −.57 .56

Note. All coefficients were estimated controlling for age at the within-level and age, gender, sexual identity, and race/ethnicity at the between-persons level. Dichotomous variable coding: relationship involvement (not in a relationship = 0; in a relationship = 1), gender (cisgender women = 0; cisgender men = 1), sexual identity (lesbian/gay = 0; bisexual = 1). OR = odds ratio; relationship inv. = relationship involvement).