Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 8.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Ecol Evol. 2018 Oct 8;2(11):1772–1781. doi: 10.1038/s41559-018-0682-4

Table 1. Differentially expressed genes.

OPTIC TECTUM
Attractive vs Dull Attractive vs Female Dull vs Female Total
(unique genes)
Preference Attractive vs Dull genes that pass permutation 5% threshold 1278 (x) 1125 982 2746
Preference DE genes
(after filtering§)
193 (P) - - -
Social DE genes 357
Non-Preference Genes that pass permutation 5% threshold 842 (x) 1973 1449 3393
Non-preference DE genes
(after filtering§)
61 (P) - - -
TELENCEPHALON
Attractive vs Dull Attractive vs Female Dull vs Female Total
(unique genes)
Preference Genes that pass permutation 5% threshold 919 (x) 746 785 1999
Preference DE genes
(after filtering§)
106 (P) - - -
Social DE genes 161
Non-Preference Genes that pass permutation 5% threshold 847 (x) 705 677 1853
Non-preference DE genes
(after filtering§)
38 (P) - - -

Letters in parenthesis refer to Venn diagram sections highlighted in Figure 1.

§

Genes that were considered differentially expressed between attractive and dull treatments following the permutation 5% cutoff were filtered for concordant expression across all the replicate lines, and for differential expression between attractive vs female and dull vs female keeping only genes in section P of Fig. 1. See text for further details.