Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 30;122(51):12396–12402. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b07901

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(A) Average coordination number ⟨Nb⟩ of attractive spheres (ATT_S) and ellipsoids (ATT_E) as a function of the volume fraction ϕ. Although similar at a low volume fraction, attractive spheres have a higher coordination number, implying a more homogeneous and compact cage configuration. Inset: the structure factor S(q*) supports this notion, and the larger values at a high volume fraction cause a stronger slowing down for spheres compared with ellipsoids, which compensates the mobility difference. (B, C) The structure factor S(q) for different volume fractions of (B) attractive sphere and (C) ellipsoid. rs = 3σ is the radius of the sphere,23 and ra = 5σ, rb = 2.95σ, and rc = 2.5σ are the semiprincipal axes of the ellipsoid.