Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 28.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Inf Model. 2018 Nov 27;59(1):215–228. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00616

Table 4.

Ligand–protein interaction self-energies (Eself) based on the optimized Drude polarizable force field.a Errors shown are standard errors based on the three independent simulations for each system.

PDB Opt-Drude-El Opt-Drude-E2 Opt-Drude-E3
Metdod E1self E2self E3self
2ZC9 −101.0 ± 2.7 −5.6 ± 7.6 15.7 ± 6.1
2UW8 −42.0 ± 12.0 −93.3 ± 11.4 −99.2 ± 11.6
4DT6 −126.2 ± 6.9 39.9 ± 12.0 51.0 ± 13.4
4N1T 2.2 ± 1.6 8.9 ± 5.5 13.1 ± 6.5
3IX8 −2.5 ± 0.8 −11.3 ± 2.5 −6.0 ± 2.3
2AG6 78.6 ± 15.7 9.2 ± 24.9 24.9 ± 35.2
3JUM −237 ± 25.3 292.7 ± 21.8 334.0 ± 17.3
a

In methods 1–3, each self-energy contribution from the complex, protein and ligand were obtained (e.g. Eself, comp, Eself, prot, and Eself, ligand). The self-energy for each component is calculated from the total bond energy minus the bond energy with the Drude particles omitted based on the geometry after Drude particles are relaxed in the SCF calculation. Eself is calculated as Eself, comp - Eself, prot - Eself, ligand. Self-energies from method 4 are zero, i.e. Eself, comp = Eself, prot + Eself, ligand, as no relaxation of Drude particles is performed.