Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Sex Behav. 2018 Aug 20;48(1):383–395. doi: 10.1007/s10508-018-1258-8

Table 2.

Bivariate Comparisons Between Chronotype and Age of Timing of Last CAS and SWC with Casual Partners

Total Daytime,
6am to 5pm
Evening,
5–9pm
From 9pm to
midnight
Midnight or
later
Test Statistic

Last CAS with casual partner n n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)  

Overall 344 108 (31.4) 66 (19.2) 81 (23.5) 89 (25.9)  
Chronotype
  Morning Type 62 25 (40.3) 15 (24.2) 10 (16.1) 12 (19.4) χ2(6) = 10.20
  Intermediate Type 180 55 (30.6) 34 (18.9) 49 (27.2) 42 (23.3)
  Evening Type 102 28 (27.5) 17 (16.7) 22 (21.6) 35 (34.3)

  M (SD) M (SD) M (SD) M (SD) M (SD)

Age (years) 38.3 (12.4) 40.7 (12.8)a 41.1 (12.8)ab 36.3 (11.5)bc 35.1 (11.5)c F(3,340) = 5.44**

Last SWC with casual partner n n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)

Overall 344 119 (34.6) 65 (18.9) 91 (26.5) 69 (20.1)  
Chronotype
  Morning Type 62 30 (48.4)a 10 (16.1) 15 (24.2) 7 (11.3)a χ2(6) = 16.78**
  Intermediate Type 180 66 (36.7)b 38 (21.1) 42 (23.3) 34 (18.9)b
  Evening Type 102 23 (22.5)c 17 (16.7) 34 (33.3) 28 (27.5)c

  M (SD) M (SD) M (SD) M (SD) M (SD)

Age (years) 38.3 (12.4) 39.2 (12.4) 39.0 (10.9) 38.2 (12.6) 36.2 (12.6) F(3,340) = 0.97

Note. CAS = condomless anal sex; SWC = sex with condoms. Within rows within continuous variables, cells with different superscripts differ significantly. Within columns within categorical variables, different superscripts signify that proportions among groups differ significantly.

**

p ≤ 0.01.