. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 1.

Published in final edited form as: Arch Sex Behav. 2018 Aug 20;48(1):383–395. doi: 10.1007/s10508-018-1258-8

Table 6.

Logistic Regressions Predicting Whether Tiredness Increases Sexual Desire and Odds of Bottoming, N = 1113

	Step 1				Step 2

Sexual Desire:	B	AOR	P	95% CI	B	AOR	p	95% CI

Constant	−0.90	0.41	<0.001		−0.96	0.38	<0.001
Age	−0.02	0.98	<0.001	[0.97 0.99]	−0.02	0.98	<0.001	[0.97, 0.99]
Chronotype (ref. Morning Type)
Intermediate Type					0.02	1.00	0.99	[0.70, 1.43]
Evening Type					0.19	1.21	0.34	[0.82, 1.80]
Model Statistics:	Model χ²(1) = 18.47, p <0.001				Step χ²(2) = 1.70, p = 0.43
	Hosmer & Lemeshow χ²(8) = 15.65, p = 0.05				Hosmer & Lemeshow χ²(8) = 8.40, p = 0.40

Odds of Bottoming:	B	AOR	P	95% CI	B	AOR	p	95% CI

Constant	−1.06	0.35	<0.001		-3.26	0.04	<0.001
Age	−0.02	0.99	<0.01	[0.98 1.00]	-0.01	0.99	0.07	[0.98, 1.00]
Positioning Identity (ref. Top)
Top/Versatile					1.94	6.93	<0.001	[3.21, 14.95]
Versatile					2.73	15.39	<0.001	[7.23, 32.73]
Bottom/Versatile					2.71	15.01	<0.001	[7.08, 31.81]
Bottom					2.39	10.90	<0.001	[4.94, 24.06]
	Model χ²(1) = 9.20, p <0.01				Step χ²(4) = 109.86, p <0.001
	Hosmer & Lemeshow χ²(8) = 8.79, p = 0.36				Hosmer & Lemeshow χ²(8) = 8.66, p = 0.37

Note. AOR = adjusted odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; ref. = referent