Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 13;4(1):70–78. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2018.08.002

Table 3.

Characteristics of patients who experienced late grade 2+ rectal bleeding versus those who did not

Variable GR2+ RB (n = 32)
No RB (n = 160)
n (%) or median (range) n (%) or median (range)
Age, y 69 (55-86) 69 (51-83)
Ultrasound-based prostate volume, cm3 42.0 (12.0-77.6) 40.0 (12.0-100.4)
Medication use
 Aspirin 15 (46.9) 59 (36.9)
 Anticoagulation 8 (25.0) 14 (8.8)
 Alpha blocker 11 (34.4) 26 (16.3)
Risk category
 Low 8 (25.0) 30 (18.8)
 Intermediate 16 (50) 88 (55.0)
 High 8 (25) 42 (26.2)
Baseline EPIC score 98.2 (62.5-100) 96.4 (60.7-100)
Comorbidities
 Diabetes 1 (3.1) 18 (11.3)
 Hypertension 18 (56.3) 78 (48.8)
 Hemorrhoids 2 (6.3) 24 (15.0)
Androgen deprivation therapy 10 (31.3) 61 (38.1)
Pencil beam scanning (vs uniform scanning) 22 (68.8) 122 (76.3)
Number of fields treated/day
 1 15 (46.9) 77 (48.1)
 2 17 (53.1) 83 (51.9)
Seminal vesicle radiation 24 (75.0) 130 (81.3)
Whole pelvis radiation 1 (3.1) 18 (11.3)

Abbreviations: EPIC = Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite; GR = grade; RB = rectal bleeding.