Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 29;38(2):195–209. doi: 10.1007/s00299-018-2362-x

Table 2.

The frequency of embryogenic microspores1 in microspore suspension of DH lines of triticale on the day of isolation as the effect of various tiller pre-treatments (experiment 2)

DH line LT LT + GSH LT + 4dGSH
DH119 7.4 ± 1.3bcd 3.6 ± 1.0d
DH19 7.5 ± 2.5bcd 2.2 ± 2.2d 20.8 ± 4.6a
DH47 16.6 ± 7.2abc 6.6 ± 2.7cd 13.9 ± 2.4abc
DH28 18.3 ± 2.2ab 17.3 ± 3.5abc
DH18 21.1 ± 9.9a 13.1 ± 1.7abcd
Source of variation Mean squares/p
DH line 532.186/***
Treatment 515.555/*
DH line × treatment 42.882/ns

The mean from at least three biological replications (isolations) ± SE. Data marked with the same letter do not differ according to the Duncan test (p ≤ 0.05). The sources of variance for embryogenic potential were as follows: five DH lines, three treatments, and interaction between DH line and treatment

LT low temperature pre-treatment of tillers (21 days at 4 °C); LT + 3–8d GSH low temperature pre-treatment of tillers (21 days at 4 °C) combined with short GSH pre-treatment (0.3 mM GSH applied 3–8 days before microspore isolation); LT + GSH low temperature pre-treatment of tillers (21 days at 4 °C) combined with long GSH pre-treatment (0.3 mM GSH applied 21 days before microspore isolation)

*, ***Significant at p ≤ 0.05, 0.001, respectively; ns not significant

1The percentage of star-like structures (SLS) and microspores undergoing the first symmetrical nucleus division

‘–’ 4-day GSH pre-treatment was not applied