Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 29.
Published in final edited form as: Microsc Res Tech. 2013 Mar 27;76(6):625–632. doi: 10.1002/jemt.22209

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

a: The averaged T1 profiles before (N = 3) and after (N = 18) the specimens were immersed in the Gd solution, and the calculated GAG profile. b: The averaged T2 profiles (N = 18, only one pixel in every two pixels was plotted) at two specimen orientations: 0° and 55°. c: The averaged profiles of optical retardation (N > 36) and angle (N > 36; only one pixel in every 10 pixels was plotted). d: The averaged dichroic ratio profiles of the amide I and II (N > 36, only one pixel in every five pixels was plotted). Error bars represented SD (standard deviations).