Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 25;91(1090):20170401. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170401

Table 5.

Common scanning pitfalls effecting subjective image quality42

Common pitfallsa Recommendations for error correction & quality assurance
FOV error
  • Radiographer training in defining appropriate FOV

  • Periodic review of FOV guidelines

Motion
  • Radiographer training in appropriate patient coaching, observation, & image review

Incomplete inspiration
  • Radiographer training in appropriate patient coaching & observation

  • Rehearsal of inspiration and monitoring of full inspiration for breath-holding

Scan length error
  • Over-scanning > 3 cm below the lungs

  • Incomplete coverage of the lungs

  • Radiographer training on minimizing abdominal scanning including use of maximum inspiration for topogram and spiral images and use of lateral topogram

  • Complete preliminary review of all images to ensure full coverage before patient leaves the scanner as part of examination completion checklist

  • Periodic review of scan length guidelines

Artefacts obscuring anatomy
  • Streak

  • Ring

  • Beam-hardening

  • Excessive noise

  • Review scanner technology limitations and adjust acquisition parameters and/or conduct dedicated troubleshooting and maintenance procedures

  • For patients with metal implants, such as orthopedic shoulder joint replacements, careful positioning is of benefit to minimize artefact

FOV, field of view.

aFor CTLCS, FOV should be <3 cm beyond outer rib margins. No degradation of the study due to respiratory or trunk motion, and pulsation artefact should be minimized. Sufficient inspiration resulting in no more than minimal dependent atelectasis. A complete CTLCS examination includes the entire cephalocaudal length of lungs with no missing images, lung anatomy or gaps between sections. The number of CT sections below the most caudal lung containing image should be minimized. Anatomic feature should not be obscured by image artefacts (e.g. streak, ring or beam-hardening artefact).