Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 21;91(1090):20180196. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180196

Table 5.

(a) Diagnostic accuracy of pre-TAVI CT vs invasive coronary angiography using a cutoff value >50% of coronary artery stenoses (b) diagnostic accuracy of pre-TAVI CT vs invasive coronary angiography using a cutoff value >50% of coronary artery stenoses (including all vessels)

(a) Segment-based analysis (excluding not evaluable segments)
No. of segments No of TN findings No of TP findings No of FN findings No of FP findings Sensitivity Specificity NPV PPV Accuracy
1644 1194 315 9 126 97
(96–98)
90
(87–92)
99
(98–99)
71 (67–75) 91 (86–93)
Segment-based analysis (with not-evaluable segments censored as positive findings)
No. of vessels No of TN findings No of TP findings No of FN findings No of FP findings Sensitivity Specificity NPV PPV Accuracy
1725 1194 327 9 195 97
(96–98)
85
(84–87)
99
(98–99)
62 (58–66) 88 (86–89)
(b) Vessel-based analysis
No. of vessels No of TN findings No of TP findings No of FN findings No of FP findings Sensitivity Specificity NPV PPV Accuracy
345 242 68 3 32 95
(93–98)
88
(84–92)
98
(97–100)
68 (58–77) 89 (86–92)
Patient-based analysis
No. of patients No of TN findings No of TP findings No of FN findings No of FP findings Sensitivity Specificity NPV PPV Accuracy
115 80 22 1 12 95
(91–97)
86
(80–93)
98
(96–100)
64 (48–80) 88 (82–94)

FN, false-negative; FP, false-positive; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value; TN, true-negative; TP, true-positive.

In parentheses data are 95% confidence interval.