Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 12;91(1090):20170405. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170405

Table 2.

Absolute and percentage bias in nodule sizing between readers

Systematic error (95%-LoA)
Interreader nodule volume Interreader nodule diameter Intrareader nodule diameter
Nodule margins Abs.
(mm3)
% Abs.
(mm)
DBV
(mm3)
% Abs.
(mm)
DBV
(mm3)
%
Smooth 0.7
(±22.4)
−0.1
(±21.4)
−0.1a
(±1.9)
−6.2
(±146.2)
−0.7
(±83.3)
0.0a
(±1.4)
2.8
(±90.0)
−0.1
(±71.0)
Lobulated 1.0
(±23.8)
−0.3
(±18.1)
−0.2a
(±2.0)
−29.6a
(±191.7)
−6.6
(±86.0)
0.2a
(±1.5)
21.6a
(±150.5)
−6.6a
(±66.4)
Spiculated 4.8
(±49.9)
−1.4
(±28.2)
0.0a
(±3.5)
−28.1
(±410.4)
3.9
(±122.1)
0.6a
(±2.4)
64.4a
(±278.0)
3.9a
(±83.9)
Irregular 0.7
(±61.3)
0.2
(±27.0)
0.5a
(±4.5)
77.5a
(±1100.0)
15.9 (±122.5) 0.4a
(±2.9)
89.7a
(±705.8)
15.9
(±84.9)
Total (n = 100) −1.1
(±42.3)
−0.4
(±23.7)
0.0a
(±3.2)
3.4
(±602.3)
3.1
(±106)
0.3a
(±2.2)
44.6a
(±393.2)
10.5
(±78.0)

95%-LoA, 95% limits of agreement; Abs, absolute systematic error; DBV, diameter based volume.

% symbol denotes relative systematic error for volume and diameter-based volume.

Number in brackets is 95%-LoA, bold 95%-LoA exceeds the growth cut-off of 25% or 1.5 mm.

a

Significant difference p < 0.05.