Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Ind Med. 2018 Sep 19;61(11):939–951. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22907

TABLE 3.

Any tobacco use by organizational and worker characteristics—2015

Construction workersa
Non-construction workers
Any tobacco use
Any tobacco use
Construction workers compared with non-construction workers
Characteristics NX1000 (%) P 95%CI PORb 95%CI NX1000 (%) P 95%CI PORb 95%CI PORc 95%CI
Worker class
 Private company 7421 (75.5) 34.4 30.2–38.7 1.0 - 114 198 (75.5) 22.2 21.3–23.2 1.0 - 1.7d 1.4–2.0
 Government 246 (2.5) 23.0 8.4–37.6 0.9 0.4–2.3 24 442 (16.2) 13.7 12.1–15.2 0.6 0.5–0.8 1.7 0.8–3.9
 Self employed 2149 (21.9) 30.0 23.1–36.9 0.2 0.1–2.9 12 246 (8.1) 16.2 13.7–18.7 0.6 0.2–1.8 - -
Work arrangement
 Standard 5680 (62.9) 33.7 28.9–38.6 1.0 - 115 411 (84.0) 20.3 19.4–21.2 1.0 - 1.6d 1.3–2.1
 Independent 2079 (23.0) 30.5 23.9–37.2 1.2 0.6–2.2 12 500 (9.1) 17.5 14.9–20.1 0.9 0.7–1.3 2.5d 1.4–4.5
 Temp 749 (8.3) 38.3 24.5–52.0 1.4 0.7–2.8 3391 (2.5) 30.3 24.3–36.5 1.6 0.9–2.6 1.4 0.7–2.9
 Other 522 (5.8) - - 6044 (4.4) 17.1 13.7–20.4 0.7 0.4–0.9 - -
Size of establishment
 <50 employees 7368 (77.1) 34.4 30.2–38.6 1.4 0.7–3.0 75 682 (51.4) 21.8 20.5–23.0 1.2 1.0–1.4 1.9d 1.4–2.4
 50–250 employees 1371 (14.3) 29.2 20.7–37.7 1.1 0.5–2.8 34 315 (23.3) 21.1 18.5–22.8 1.2 1.0–1.4 1.2 0.8–1.9
 ≥250 employees 819 (8.6) 28.3 15.4–41.2 1.0 - 37 137 (25.2) 17.3 15.8–18.8 1.0 - 1.4 0.7–2.9
Number of years on the job
 ≤5 years 3224 (40.4) 38.1 33.1–43.1 1.3 0.8–2.2 84 580 (46.2) 23.5 22.5–24.5 1.3d 1.1–1.5 1.9d 1.3–2.6
 >5 years 4764 (59.6) 28.1 23.4–32.9 1.0 - 66 272 (53.8) 16.3 15.1–17.5 1.0 - 1.6d 1.4–2.5
Second hand smoke exposuree
 Yes 4444 (49.4) 44.5 38.7–50.4 3.0d 1.9–4.7 30 004 (21.9) 34.9 32.9–36.9 2.8d 2.4–3.2 1.2 0.9–1.7
 No 4561 (50.6) 21.0 16.6–25.4 1.0 - 107 248 (78.1) 16.0 15.1–16.8 1.0 - 1.3d 1.0–1.8
Work-family imbalancef
 Agree/strongly agree 2181 (24.2) 33.9 26.8–40.9a 1.1 0.7–1.9 35 009 (25.5) 21.8 20.2–23.5 1.1 1.0–1.3 1.5d 1.0–2.3
 Disagree/strongly disagree 6815 (75.8) 32.3 27.9–36.7 1.0 - 102 076 (74.5) 19.6 18.6–20.4 1.0 - 1.7d 1.4–2.2
Job insecurityg
 Yes 1074 (11.9) 37.7 26.6–48.9 1.4 0.6–3.1 15 004 (10.9) 22.0 19.8–24.3 1.1 1.0–1.3 1.8d 1.0–3.5
 No 7925 (88.1) 31.7 27.7–35.7 1.0 - 122 126 (89.1) 19.9 19.1–20.8 1.0 - 1.7d 1.4–2.1
Work demandh
 Agree/strongly agree 7927 (87.9) 32.3 28.3–36.3 0.6 0.3–1.3 117 195 (85.4) 20.2 19.4–21.1 1.0 1.0–1.2 1.6d 1.3–2.0
 Disagree/strongly disagree 1089 (12.1) 35.0 23.7–46.3 1.0 - 19 957 (14.6) 19.3 17.3–21.3 1.0 - 2.2d 1.2–4.1
Work place safetyi
 Safe 8294 (92.6) 31.9 28.1–35.7 1.0 - 131 467 (95.8) 19.8 18.9–20.6 1.0 - 1.7d 1.4–2.0
 Unsafe 664 (7.4) 39.9 26.2–53.7 0.9 0.4–2.1 5835 (4.2) 28.6 24.6–32.6 1.7d 1.3–2.1 1.0 0.5–2.0
Support from supervisorsj
 Agree/strongly agree 6419 (91.4) 32.4 28.0–36.9 1.0 - 112 951 (90.0) 20 19.1–20.9 1.0 - 1.7d 1.4–2.1
 Disagree/strongly disagree 606 (8.6) 42.7 27.5–57.9 1.1 0.5–2.3 12 531 (10.0) 25.3 22.4–28.3 1.3d 1.0–1.6 1.8 0.9–3.6
Health/safety important to managementk
 Agree/strongly agree 6667 (94.0) 33.5 29.2–37.8 1.0 - 119 031 (94.5) 20.1 19.2–21.0 1.0 - 1.7d 1.4–2.1
 Disagree/strongly disagree 427 (6.0) 29.7 14.4–45.1 0.5 0.1–1.7 6960 (5.5) 25.6 21.9–29.3 1.0 0.7–1.3 1.1 0.5–2.5
Health promotionl
 Yes 1686 (23.9) 32.8 22.9–42.7 1.0 - 60 018 (48.0) 18.3 17.0–19.6 1.0 - 1.8d 1.1–2.9
 No 5365 (76.1) 33.4 28.4–38.3 0.9 0.4–1.6 64 945 (52.0) 22.6 21.3–23.8 1.0 0.9–1.2 1.6d 1.3–2.0
Health promotion participation (yes)
 Participates 920 (54.8) 27.3 14.6–40.1 1.0 - 32 267 (53.8) 16.6 15.0–18.2 1.0 - 1.5 0.8–2.9
 Do not participate 766 (45.4) 39.4 24.4–54.2 1.8 0.7–4.9 27 751 (46.2) 20.3 18.4–22.2 1.2d 1.0–1.4 2.3d 1.2–4.5

P, prevalence. Totals may not add up due to rounding, unknown and missing values; Non-construction workers include all other workers (n = _150 875 491).

a

Weighted to provide national annual average estimates for currently employment construction workers.

b

Prevalence odds ratio; adjusted for age, work-family imbalance, job insecurity, work demand, workplace safety, job support, years on the job, establishment size, work arrangement, worker class, POR is defined as the odds of using tobacco products within construction and odds of using tobacco within non construction separately, compared with the referent group as noted in table.

c

Prevalence odds ratio; adjusted for age, work-family imbalance, job insecurity, work demand, workplace safety, job support, years on the job, establishment size, work arrangement, worker class, Reference group includes non-construction workers. POR is defined as the odds of using tobacco products among construction workers compared with the odds among non-construction workers.

d

Statistically significant differences (P < 0.05).

e

Responded “yes” to the question “in past 12 months, while at work, how often were you exposed to tobacco smoke from other people?”

f

Responded strongly agree/agree or disagree/strongly disagree to the question, “Does your Job interfere with personal or family life/”

g

Responded yes/no to the question, to worried about losing job?

h

Responded strongly agree/agree or disagree/strongly disagree to the question, “Do you have enough time to get the job done?”

i

Responded very unsafe/unsafe or safe/very safe to the question, “How safe do you think your workplace is?”

j

Responded strongly agree/agree or disagree/strongly disagree to the question, “Can you count on your supervisor or manager for support when you need it?”

k

Responded strongly agree/ agree, or disagree/strongly disagree to the question, “Is health and safety of workers is a high priority with management at work?”

l

Responded “yes” to the question, “In the past year, were health promotion programs made available to you by your employer? Examples of health promotion?” programs include education about weight management, smoking cessation, screening for high blood pressure, high cholesterol, or other health risks, and onsite fitness facilities or discounted gym memberships.