Table 3.
Split half correlations of individual differences tasks
Construct | Task | Split half correlation |
---|---|---|
Language experience | ART | 0.721 |
ERVT | 0.702 | |
NAART | 0.827 | |
Verbal working memory | Reading | 0.623 |
Listening | 0.574 | |
Operation | 0.807 | |
Inhibitory control | Flanker | 0.287 |
Anti. Acc. | 0.891 | |
Anti. RT | 0.892 | |
Stroop | 0.834 | |
Phonological ability | Pseudo. Rep. | 0.791 |
BNW | 0.531 | |
PR | 0.459 | |
Perceptual speed | Letter | 0.893 |
Pattern | 0.916 |
Notes: Tasks were split into balanced halves, scores were calculated for each subject in each half in the same manner as in the main analyses, and the two lists of subject scores were correlated. ART = Author Recognition Test (Stanovich & West, 1989; Acheson et al., 2008); ERVT = Extended Range Vocabulary Test (Ekstrom et al., 1976); CRH = Comparative Reading Habits (Acheson et al., 2008); NAART = North American Adult Reading Test (Blair & Spreen, 1989); RTE = Reading Time Estimate (Acheson et al., 2008); “Listening” = Listening Span task (Daneman & Carpenter, 1986; Stine & Hindman, 1994; Unsworth et al., 2005); “Operation” = Operation Span task (Turner & Engle, 1989; Unsworth et al., 2005); “Reading” = Reading Span task (Daneman & Carpenter, 1986; Stine & Hindman, 1994; Unsworth et al., 2005); “Anti.Acc” and “Anti.RT” refer to accuracy and median reaction time on the Antisaccade Task (Kane et al., 2001), respectively; “Flanker” = Flanker task (Eriksen & Eriksen, 1974); ; “Stroop” = Stroop task (Stroop, 1935; Brown-Schmidt, 2009); “Pseudo.Rep” = Pseudoword Repetition (Gupta, 2003); BNW = Blending Nonwords (Wagner et al., 1999); PR = Phoneme Reversal (Wagner et al., 1999); “Letter” = Letter Comparison (Salthouse & Babcock, 1991); “Pattern” = Pattern Comparison (Salthouse & Babcock, 1991).