Table 8.

Fixed effects in model of residual reading times in Verb Bias sentences

	Fixed effect	Estimate	SE	p-value
	(Intercept)	−0.102	0.042	0.015
Individual differences	VWM	−0.003	0.040	0.938
	Inhib.	−0.051	0.057	0.375
	Lang.	−0.010	0.048	0.835
	Phon.	−0.002	0.048	0.971
	Speed	−0.094	0.036	0.010
Condition effects	Ambiguous	0.071	0.016	<0.001
	DO Bias	0.033	0.057	0.567
	Ambiguous × DO Bias	0.096	0.031	0.003
Individual difference × Condition effect interactions	VWM × Ambiguous	−0.005	0.014	0.710
	VWM × DO Bias	0.015	0.014	0.298
	Inhib. × Ambiguous	−0.001	0.021	0.959
	Inhib. × DO Bias	−0.011	0.020	0.575
	Lang. × Ambiguous	−0.005	0.017	0.783
	Lang. × DO Bias	−0.004	0.017	0.815
	Phon. × Ambiguous	0.023	0.018	0.200
	Phon. × DO Bias	0.017	0.017	0.332
	Speed × Ambiguous	0.001	0.013	0.910
	Speed × DO Bias	−0.021	0.013	0.095
	VWM × Ambiguous × DO Bias	−0.019	0.029	0.509
	Inhib. × Ambiguous × DO Bias	−0.023	0.041	0.573
	Lang. × Ambiguous × DO Bias	−0.022	0.034	0.518
	Phon. × Ambiguous × DO Bias	0.020	0.035	0.564
	Speed × Ambiguous × DO Bias	−0.045	0.026	0.089

Notes: Effects coding was used for condition effects. Condition effects here refer to the change in residual reading time when sentences were ambiguous (0.5) opposed to unambiguous (−0.5) and DO-biased (0.5) opposed to SC-biased (−0.5). Random intercepts and slopes for all condition effects for both subjects and items were also included in the model. “VWM” = Verbal working memory span; “Inhib” = Inhibitory control; “Speed” = Perceptual speed; “Phon.” = Phonological ability; “Lang.” = Language experience.