Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov;16(11):689–696.

Table II.

Comparison of basic and functional semen parameters in different classes of 25-OHD concentration

25-OHD<10 ng ml -1 (n= 26) 10 ng ml -1 ≤25-OHD<20 ng ml -1 (n= 31) 25-OHD≥20 ng ml -1 (n= 5)
Sperm concentration (M/ml) 17.4 ± 3.9 23.55 ± 3.8 26.4 ± 8.5
Sperm total motility (%) 29.54 ± 3.5 35.84 ± 2.7 38.4 ± 5.7
Normal morphology (%) 3.34 ± 0.7 5.54 ± 1 5.2 ± 1.6
25-OHD concentration (ng/ml) 7.53 ± 0.3 15.07 ± 0.5a 36.8 ± 7.7b
TUNEL positive cells (%) 14.37 ± 1.6 9.82 ± 1.2 9.63 ± 2.1
ROS content (RLU/min) 0.79 ± 0.09 0.57 ± 0.09 0.42 ± 0.18
hMMP sperms (%) 50.76 ± 3.4 59.9 ± 4.8 70.23 ± 0.96

Data were presented as mean±standard error of mean (Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison, and ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison)

25-OHD: 25-hydroxy vitamin D

ROS: reactive oxygen species

hMMP: high mitochondrial membrane potential

a

; significant difference between insufficient and deficient groups

b

; significant difference between sufficient and deficient groups