Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov;16(11):689–696.

Table III.

Comparison of basic and functional semen parameters in NS and OAT men categorized according to concentration of 25-OHD

25-OHD<10 ng ml -1
10 ng ml -1 ≤25-OHD<20 ng ml -1
25-OHD≥20 ng ml -1
NS (n= 5) OAT (n= 21) NS (n= 12) OAT (n= 19) NS (n= 3) OAT (n= 2)
Sperm concentration (M/ml) 42.8 ± 17.3 11.36 ± 0.6 43.4 ± 6.6 11 ± 0.8 36.67 ± 10.5 11 ± 3
Sperm total motility (%) 55.6 ± 8 23.33 ± 2.5 50.75 ± 2.2 26.42 ± 2.4 47.33 ± 1.4 25 ± 5
Normal morphology (%) 10 ± 1.6 1.76 ± 0.2 11.58 ± 1.4 1.73 ± 0.26 7.66 ± 1.2 1.5 ± 0.5
25-OHD concentration (ng/ml) 6.94 ± 0.8 7.68 ± 0.3 14.63 ± 0.7a 15.34 ± 0.7a 33.87 ± 8.4a 41.2 ± 18.9a
TUNEL positive cells (%) 14.09 ± 4.4 14.44 ± 1.7 7.01 ± 1.3 11.61 ± 1.6 7.82 ± 3.2 12.35 ± 1.3
ROS content (RLU/min) 0.45 ± 0.15 0.86 ± 0.11 0.24 ± 0.04 0.78 ± 0.12 0.34 ± 0.2 0.54 ± 0.43
hMMP sperms (%) 65.91 ± 5.5 48.24 ± 3.4 68.24 ± 4.07 50.53 ± 8.3 70.5 ± 1.6 69.7 ± 2.8

Data were presented as mean ± standard error of mean (Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison)

25-OHD: 25-hydroxy vitamin D

NS: normozoospermic

OAT: oligoasthenoteratozoospermic

ROS: reactive oxygen species

hMMP: High mitochondrial membrane potential

a

; significant difference when compared with its counterpart in deficient group (25-OHD<10 ng ml-1)