Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018 Dec 12;64(1):36–45. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12936

Table 4. Contraception methods used by sexually active, non-pregnant women with diabetes ages 24–32 in Add Health, Wave IV, 2007–2009 (N=381).

More effective contraceptiona,b Less effective contraceptiona,c No contraceptiona Pd
Diagnosis statuse, n (%) < .001
Diagnosed 98 (43.3) 51 (22.2) 64 (34.5)
Undiagnosed 66 (28.8) 72 (51.1) 30 (20.1)
Glycemic control, n (%) < .001
A1C < 6.5% 65 (41.3) 31 (18.6) 44 (40.2)
A1C > 6.5% 99 (34.7) 92 (45.4) 50 (19.9)
a

Unweighted n reported with weighted row percentages.

b

More effective contraceptive methods are tubal ligation/sterilization; vasectomy; IUD (intrauterine device), coil, loop; emergency IUD insertion; Norplant; birth control pills; Patch (Ortho Evra); ring (NuvaRing); and shot (Depo-Provera).

c

Less effective methods are condoms (rubbers); female condom; diaphragm, cap or shield; natural family planning (safe periods by temperature, cervical mucus test); rhythm or safe period by calendar; emergency contraception or “morning after” pill; withdrawal (pulling out); vaginal sponge; contraceptive film; and spermicide foam, jelly, creme, suppositories.

d

Rao-Scott design-adjusted F test conducted.

e

Diagnosis status based on self-report or use of anti-hyperglycemic medications.