Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan;9(1):86–93. doi: 10.21037/qims.2018.12.01

Table 1. Measurement differences between original CT, STL file and CT of 3D printed model.

Landmarks/comparisons Differences (%) in measurements by Observer 1/Observer 2
STL file compared to original CT CT of 3D printed model compared to original CT STL file compared to CT of 3D printed model
LR AP LR AP LR AP
Common hepatic duct 19.6 [7]/23.8 [4] 6.0 [2]/6.5 [2] 15.2 [3]/18.3 [3] 9.4 [3]/7.6 [2] 3.8 [6]/4.7 [6] 3.8 [7]/1.3 [2]
Right hepatic duct 23.4 [1]/23.2 [2] 19.1 [7]/18.9 [11] 24 [1]/22.9 [2] 28.8 [1]/30.9 [2] 0.80 [3]/0.16 [1] 13.6 [4]/17.3 [8]
Left hepatic duct 22.2 [3]/21.8 [1] 16.9 [5]/13.1 [4] 23.7 [6]/19.0 [6] 21.4 [1]/13.7 [3] 2.0 [3]/3.5 [1] 5.9 [2]/0.7 [2]
Biliary cyst 3.2 [2]/3.8 [3] 2.6 [3]/0.5 [1] 4.4 [3]/3.9 [4] 0.7 [1]/0.2 [1] 1.2 [1]/0.1 [1] 1.8 [1]/0.7 [1]

Numbers in the brackets indicate standard deviation. LR, left to right dimension; AP, anterior to posterior dimension; STL, standard tessellation language; CT, computed tomography.