Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan;9(1):43–52. doi: 10.21037/qims.2018.09.16

Table 1. Surface and volumes comparison using means of Hausdorff distances and volumetry, respectively.

Case # Liver parenchyma Tumor
Hausdorff distance (mm) Volume (cm3) Volume (cm3)
Max Mean PCT MCT Error PCT MCT Error
1 48.608 5.393 1,512.27 1,371.07 −141.20 0.78 1.85 1.07
2 14.465 3.859 1,448.03 1,265.00 −183.03 117.47 116.08 −1.39
3 22.563 2.917 1,412.60 1,261.1 −151.50 14.36 15.03 0.67
4 26.593 2.693 1,486.62 1,446.7 −39.92 188.25 182.04 −6.21
5 14.839 1.709 1,275.38 1,281.84 6.46 6.44 4.24 −2.20
6 12.592 1.656 1,799.97 1,844.01 44.04 172.55 156.57 −15.98
7 8.695 1.293 941.03 902.46 −38.57 13.60 10.25 −3.35
8 45.869 6.447 2,541.42 1,521.24 −1,020.18 4.245 4.239 −0.01
9 15.291 1.920 1,608.28 1,510.41 −97.87 12.11 11.59 −0.52
10 19.049 2.155 1,229.12 1,201.01 −28.11 42.98 40.99 −1.99
11 19.538 1.603 1,874.00 1,746.22 −127.78 0.79 0.18 −0.61
12 7.144 0.521 953.36 941.15 −12.21 22.23 15.16 −7.07
13 18.811 2.515 1,385.68 1,236.93 −148.75 130.63 113.95 −16.68
14 21.879 0.865 1,722.68 1,708.22 −14.46 2.45 2.04 −0.41
15 12.061 0.974 1,198.94 1,148.27 −50.67 15.92 9.93 −5.99
Median 18.811 1.920 1,488.03 1,281.84 −50.67 14.36 11.59 −1.99

In livers with multiple tumors, mean values were reported. PCT, patient computed tomography; MCT, model computed tomography.